Hi all,
I wonder is there a solr web service available? or I have to use tools like
Apache httpClient to send requests and get responses? Many thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Solr-web-service-available--tf3557536.html#a9933854
Sent from the Solr - User mailing li
: What is Field Term Vector? how we can use this?
I don't think anything in Solr uses Term Vector's out of hte box ... they
are a low level Lucene concept that may be useful to you if you are
writting a custo mRequestHandler and want access to them.
-Hoss
It would be great, yes :-)
2007/4/10, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 4/10/07, jb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for your answer. I will use a timestamp while waiting.
> Do you think this feature will be added in a future release ?
Most likely... but if someone supplies a patch it mi
: core.execute( handler, sreq, rsp );
:
: IndexReader reader = sreq.getSearcher().getReader();
: DocListAndSet response = (DocListAndSet)rsp.getValues().get( "response" );
: DocIterator iter = response.docList.iterator();
: while( iter.hasNext() ) {
: Document doc = reader.document( i
Ryan McKinley wrote:
What errors are you getting? Are there exceptions in the log when it
starts up?
Just a null pointer exception.
I added a few fields to my schema, and then replaced my solr war file
with the latest build (see my message from a week ago). It wouldn't
work, so I assumed so
I'm not certain that i understand exactly what you are describing, but
there was some discussion a while back that may be similar...
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-109
...there's not a lot in the issue itself, but the linked discussion may be
fruitful for you.
if what you are describ
It will be extremely helpful to get this in the hands of others. Like most
packages, this was built out of need. As we get more eyes on it, I hope to
see it improve at the same rate as change in Solr.
I promised a few other additions to this set. Here's what I'm working on:
- More content wit
On 4/10/07, jb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for your answer. I will use a timestamp while waiting.
Do you think this feature will be added in a future release ?
Most likely... but if someone supplies a patch it might be even quicker :-)
-Yonik
Thanks for your answer. I will use a timestamp while waiting.
Do you think this feature will be added in a future release ?
2007/4/10, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 4/10/07, jb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With Lucene, instead of returning results by date, I return results in the
> reve
I really like the flexibility of naming request handlers to append general
constraints / filters.
Has anyone spun thoughts around something like a "solr.ParmSubstHandler" or any
way to pass maybe a special
ps=0:discussions; ps=1:images; ps=2:false
...
.
category:[0]
Solr-ites,
I posted this question to the Jetty list, but I figured I would post
it here as well since it is an issue with the Solr documentation as
well.
Here at ActBlue.com I have been working on integrating Solr with our
rails application in order to provide a faceted search interface to
our d
On 4/10/07, jb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
With Lucene, instead of returning results by date, I return results in the
reverse index order (last doc added is returned first)
For example :
hits = searcher.search(luceneQuery,new Sort(new SortField(null,
SortField.DOC, true))
How can I do that with
Thanx for the great contribution Jeff! A hand clap to the Solr team too.
I am looking forward to using Solr and Solr# in the coming months. Your
client is going to be a great help.
regards,
-jim
On 4/9/07, Jeff Rodenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All -
I'm proud to announce a release to
That is good to hear. I guess I was overly worried when I saw your
mention of having trouble getting the field values with the correct
types. I will be taking a look at this later this week.
Thank you very much for your prompt response.
On 4/10/07, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ther
What errors are you getting? Are there exceptions in the log when it starts up?
On 4/10/07, Andrew Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anyone have a good method of debugging a schema?
I have been struggling to get my new schema to run for the past couple
of days and just do not see anything wr
There is nothing particularly magic to it. It is just fills up
SolrParams directly (see any of the tests) calling the requestHandler,
then walking through the Documents. Something like:
SolrRequestHandler handler = core.getRequestHandler( "" ); // gets
the standard one
SolrQueryResponse rsp
Does anyone have a good method of debugging a schema?
I have been struggling to get my new schema to run for the past couple
of days and just do not see anything wrong with the XML document.
Thanks
Andrew
Hello,
With Lucene, instead of returning results by date, I return results in the
reverse index order (last doc added is returned first)
For example :
hits = searcher.search(luceneQuery,new Sort(new SortField(null,
SortField.DOC, true))
How can I do that with Solr ?
Thanks.
JBC
I did a bit of research on the list for prior discussions of
normalized scores and such. Please forgive me if I overlooked
something relevant, but I didn't see anything exactly what I'm looking
for.
I am building a replacement for our current text matching engine that
takes a list of documents f
Ryan,
Do you have any of this code you could share? I am currently using
Solr to perform thousands of queries in a batch, and eliminating the
HTTP overhead is something I'd love to do if it isn't complicated. We
need several of the extra features Solr provides, which is why we are
trying to use
Hi all,
I did a small count till now we have:
a) 21
b) 13
salu2
--
Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org
Open Source Java consulting, training and solutions
B
--
The information contained in this e-mail and any subsequent
correspondence is private and confidential and intended solely
for the named recipient(s). If you are not a named recipient,
you must not copy, distribute, or diss
A
On Friday 06 April 2007 19:51, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> Quick poll... Solr 2.1 release planning is underway, and a new logo
> may be a part of that.
> What "form" of logo do you prefer, A or B? There may be further
> tweaks to these pictures, but I'd like to get a sense of what the user
> communi
23 matches
Mail list logo
