On 3/2/07, Jed Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...my first try at defining a schema.xml file was tough because my
only feedback for a long time was "NullPointerException" from SolrCore
when I was trying to add content...
Can you give us enough information to reproduce the problem? What was
First time user. Not interested in flamewar, just making a suggestion.
I just got Solr working with my own schema and it was only a little more
mysterious than I expected, having previously dealth with Nutch. Solr is
exactly what I wanted in terms of (theoretical) ease of configurability.
How
: class cast exceptions when I try to use my own similarity class, like this:
: public class TestSimilarity extends DefaultSimilarity
: {
: }
I have two alternate guesses
1) this may be a missleading error message, the real problem may be that
without a default constructor, it can't instan
On 3/1/07, Graham Stead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry for interloping, but I have been wondering the same thing as Ryan. On
my current index with ~6.1M docs, I restarted Solr and ran a query that
included faceting on 4 fields:
Non-tokenized, single valued.
Then I added faceting on a 5th,
Sorry for interloping, but I have been wondering the same thing as Ryan. On
my current index with ~6.1M docs, I restarted Solr and ran a query that
included faceting on 4 fields:
QTime: 5712
numFound: 25908
filterCache stats:
lookups : 0
hits : 0
hitratio : 0.00
ins
On 3/1/07, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, I'll let you all know how it goes to facet on the (>70)
cities/counties in the united states!
Heh... how many documents?
I'll be interested in seeing some numbers. The number of documents
matching the base query and filters will also f
On 3/1/07, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/1/07, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am i missing something?
I think you're missing that the parameter that matters is the number
of unique values on which you facet. Whether they come from a
single-valued, tokenized field, or a
On 3/1/07, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am i missing something?
I think you're missing that the parameter that matters is the number
of unique values on which you facet. Whether they come from a
single-valued, tokenized field, or a multi-valued, non-tokenized
field, makes to diffe
On 3/1/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/1/07, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Faceting is much happier if you use a single valued field, but my apps
> all require multivalued fields:
If by "happy" you mean performance, things should be better in the
future though.
y
On 3/1/07, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Faceting is much happier if you use a single valued field, but my apps
all require multivalued fields:
If by "happy" you mean performance, things should be better in the
future though.
aaa
bbb
ccc
I'd like to use copyField to ac
Faceting is much happier if you use a single valued field, but my apps
all require multivalued fields:
aaa
bbb
ccc
I'd like to use copyField to accumulate the multivalued fields into a
single field that can be efficiently faceted. (As written, it adds a
new field for each one and throws a
unsubscribe
On 3/1/07, Gunther, Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can someone post their magic formula for filterCache (Erik?) We've hit
a plateau around 1.7mill docs and my response times have suffered when
filtering.
Is this for field faceting (facet.field)?
Have adjusted filtercache up and down all d
Back on facet optimizing again.
Can someone post their magic formula for filterCache (Erik?) We've hit
a plateau around 1.7mill docs and my response times have suffered when
filtering. Have adjusted filtercache up and down all day but can't seem
to get a good handle on these values. What does
I'm trying toconvert some of my code over to Solr, but I keep getting
class cast exceptions when I try to use my own similarity class, like this:
Caused by: java.lang.ClassCastException:
dealcatcher.kolinka.lucene.similarity.T
estSimilarity cannot be cast to org.apache.lucene.search.Similarity
On 3/1/07, Pierre-Yves LANDRON <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I haven't seen that maxScore you're speaking about. It's exactly what I
needed.
It's an attribute in when you elect to return scores.
0
0
score,*
ipod
on
2.4851787
electronicsconnector
car power adapter for iPod, white
I
Thank you Yonik,
I haven't seen that maxScore you're speaking about. It's exactly what I
needed.
Cheers,
P-Y L
From: "Yonik Seeley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: how to interpret the Solr score ?
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007
17 matches
Mail list logo
