Hello,
I have a question about solr's performance of accepting
inserts and indexing. If I have 10 million documents that
I'd like to index, I suppose it will take some time to
submit them to solr. Is there any faster way to do this
than through the web interface?
--
Best regards,
Jack
_
On 2/19/07, nick19701 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mike Klaas wrote:
>
> That 60, 8 produced by the synonym filter is surely signs of a bug
> (and what is producing the -52). What is your list of synonyms?
Here is:
<>
nick,
It looks as though there is a bug in the synonym filter. Since you
On 2/19/07, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the jar file is there:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/trunk/lib/
I tried a different machine in the cluster and it succeeded, so it is
per-machine thing. I'll figure it out.
I think you want: 'ant example'
Yes, that is what
the jar file is there:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/trunk/lib/
for me "ant build" gives:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /cygdrive/c/workspace/solr
$ ant build
Buildfile: build.xml
BUILD FAILED
Target `build' does not exist in this project.
Total time: 0 seconds
I think you want: 'ant exampl
Fresh checkout of solr trunk:
$ ant build
$ cd example
$ java -jar start.jar
...
20:09:16.841 INFO [main]
org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.WebApplicationContext.resolveWebApp(WebApplicationContext.java:248)
13> Extract jar:file:/home/klaas/dev/cleansolr/example/webapps/solr.war!/
to /tmp/Jetty__8983
Duuh! Stupid me. I didn't even try that. Thanks for such a quick replay. That
should solve my problem..Thanks Hoss!!
Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
>
> the square brackets raen't anything new ... they are the standard Lucene
> QUeryParser syntax for range queries, which have hte syntax...
> fi
the square brackets raen't anything new ... they are the standard Lucene
QUeryParser syntax for range queries, which have hte syntax...
field:[low TO high]
in conjuntion with the new DateMath, you need something along the lines
of...
timestamp:[NOW/DAY-1MONTH TO NOW/DAY+1DAY]
...
First off, solr has done nothing but wonders for me! So let me give everyone
envolved a big cheers!
Recently I discovered the 'new' DateField syntax options which allow
"[NOW/DAY-1MONTH]" type querys. However when going to try out this I found a
possible bug (or maybe I'm just missing something)
Mike Klaas wrote:
>
> That 60, 8 produced by the synonym filter is surely signs of a bug
> (and what is producing the -52). What is your list of synonyms?
>
> -Mike
>
>
Here is:
# The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
# (the "License"); you may not use thi
: I was thinking about the same thing. It shouldn't be too difficult to
: subclass SolrRequestHandler and build a special
: HighlightingRequestHandler that uses the builtin highlighting utils to
: do the job. I wonder if it's possible to get access to the http request
: body inside a SolrRequestHa
On 2/15/07, nick19701 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mike Klaas wrote:
>
> Corresponds to:
> startOffset =
> tokenGroup.matchStartOffset;
> endOffset =
> tokenGroup.matchEndOffset;
>
Walter:
Thanks for the feedback.
On 2/19/07, Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lucene/Solr does this automatically. That is how a tf.idf
engine works, it boosts rare words.
Do you have examples of problems or are you worrying about
something that might happen?
Actually my use case
Lucene/Solr does this automatically. That is how a tf.idf
engine works, it boosts rare words.
Do you have examples of problems or are you worrying about
something that might happen?
wunder
On 2/19/07 1:22 AM, "rubdabadub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I was wondering how are you guys de
I was thinking about the same thing. It shouldn't be too difficult to subclass
SolrRequestHandler and build a special HighlightingRequestHandler that uses the
builtin highlighting utils to do the job. I wonder if it's possible to get
access to the http request body inside a SolrRequestHandler su
Hi:
I was wondering how are you guys dealing with "common words"? What I
mean by common words is the ones that fall outside the "stop words"
category. Offcourse "stop words" is subjective i.e. its up to the
implementor. What I would like to do is how do i increase or decrease
boost value based o
15 matches
Mail list logo
