On 1/16/07, Jeff Rodenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nick - this depends on the analyzer used to index the field as well as the
analyzer used in your search query
Note that the Solr "analysis" page, in the admin interface, allows you
to see exactly how your field's content is converted for
Hi Solr users,
I'm running multiple instances of Solr, which all using the same war
file to load from.
Below is an example of the servlet context file used for each
application.
Hence each application is using the same
WEB-INF/classes/logging.properties file to configure logging.
I
On 1/15/07, Phil Rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am trying to construct a data type that given the content: ID-111 would
match on either ID or 111
Text and string wont do this, any suggestions?
The "text" field as defined by Solr example's schema.xml should
achieve this effect. Have you lo
I am trying to construct a data type that given the content: ID-111 would
match on either ID or 111
Text and string wont do this, any suggestions?
: In that respect I agree with the original posting that Solr lacks
: functionality with respect to desired functionality. One can argue that
: more or less random data should be structured by the user writing a
: decent application. However a more easy to use and configurable plugin
: architectur
Nick - this depends on the analyzer used to index the field as well as the
analyzer used in your search query. This gets handled in solr with the
fieldtype and requesthandler. Referencing the sample schema.xml off the
wiki site, I would start with fieldtype="text" and go from there. If it
doesn
Hi
This is probably more of a lucene question, but:
I have an author field,
If I query author:"Shelley Ohara" - no results are returned
If I query author:"Shelley O'hara" - many results are returned,
Is it possible, to get solr to ignore apostrophes in queries like the one above?
e.g. doc
She
Thanks Chris. DUMB of me not to have noticed.
Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
>
> : : omitNorms="true"/>
> :
>
> your "fhild_catname" isn't using "string" as it's field type -- it's using
> "text" (which is most likely using TextField and being tokenized)
>
>
>
>
>
> -Hoss
>
>
>
--
View
:
:
your "fhild_catname" isn't using "string" as it's field type -- it's using
"text" (which is most likely using TextField and being tokenized)
-Hoss
I have a document which contains the following facet -
Other - Programming
When I get back the results, the output seems to show
lst name="facet_fields">
1
1
Is there any way to prevent "other" and "programming" from being returned as
tokens ?
The schema.xml defined this as a string
: I've not yet used dynamic fields in this manner. With that number range,
: what limitations could I encounter? Given the size of that, I would need
very little, yonik recently listed the "costs" of dynamic fields...
http://www.nabble.com/Searching-multiple-indices-%28solr-newbie%29-tf2903899.
Thanks Hoss. Interesting approach, but the "N" bound could be well in the
hundreds, and the N bound would be variable (some maximum number, but
different across events.)
I've not yet used dynamic fields in this manner. With that number range,
what limitations could I encounter? Given the size
Hi!
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 12:23 +, Luis Neves wrote:
Hello.
What I do now to index XML documents it's to use a Filter to strip the markup,
this works but it's impossible to know where in the document is the match located.
What would it take to make possible to sp
On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 12:23 +, Luis Neves wrote:
> Hello.
> What I do now to index XML documents it's to use a Filter to strip the
> markup,
> this works but it's impossible to know where in the document is the match
> located.
> What would it take to make possible to specify a filter query
Hello.
What I do now to index XML documents it's to use a Filter to strip the markup,
this works but it's impossible to know where in the document is the match located.
What would it take to make possible to specify a filter query that accepts xpath
expressions?... something like:
fq=xmlField
On 1/15/07, Lukas Vlcek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ryan,
Could you be more specific on your statement?
On 1/12/07, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I started using compass a few months back. It is an amazing system:
> with almost no effort, it just works. BUT the showstopper (for
Hi Marios,
It can store the index in a database, but I wouldn't want to use that
route myself. Here is a quick link to the docs which provides an
over-view of the transactional features;
http://www.opensymphony.com/compass/versions/1.1M3/html/core-searchengine.html#core-searchengine-transacti
Ryan,
Could you be more specific on your statement?
On 1/12/07, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I started using compass a few months back. It is an amazing system:
with almost no effort, it just works. BUT the showstopper (for me)
was that you could not easily update the index from
Does compass store the lucene index in a database? If this is the
case, it is fairly straightforward to understand how this happens.
If the index is still in disk files how does it provide transactional
semantics? Would you care to give a high-level overview?
TIA
Marios
On 1/15/07, Graham O'Reg
compass provides a transaction manager for lucene indexes so you can
incorporate an index update and database update in a single transaction
or roll-back if either fails. thats why it would be interesting to see
the two working together.
Marios Skounakis wrote:
Hi all,
>
>I am working on a
Thanks for that - I have made the following changes:
- optimize more often
- omitNorms on all non-fulltext fields
- useCompoundfFile=true (will keep an eye on performance)
And that seems to have solved the problem.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Hi all,
>
>I am working on a hibernate-solr bridge that will behave like the
>compass Hibernate3GpsDevice. It gets a callback from hibernate when
>an object is stored, checks if it is 'SolrDocumentable' and sends it
>to solr using the client library from:
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
Hi,
I want to pick up this old thread from the summer (see below). I do
understand that Solr is inteded for more structured data, and that Nutch
is a good basis for cluttered information, particularly fetched from
crawlers.
However Solr's ease of setup and flexible schemas make it a viable
23 matches
Mail list logo
