The Internet Archive is getting close to going live with Solr.
I have two remaining classes of problems.
1) across the entire index, enumerate all the unique values for a given
field.
2) we use unrestricted dynamicField additions from documents. (that is
our users are free to add any named f
Hi Erik (and others),
I would like to help with this effort. But I want to make sure I understand
the landscape (forgive my noobness):
Solr Flare is actual two pieces of software: 1) a Rails application [flare]
that uses 2) a Ruby DSL [solrb] to communicate with a Solr Server. Is this
correct?
On 1/10/07, Phil Rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Follow up on that.
Say I have a field productNumber with value: hs-100313189
What tokenizer would I want to mach on a query for 100313189?
A WordDelimiterFilter with generateNumParts=true would work. But you
shouldn't use this field for facet
Follow up on that.
Say I have a field productNumber with value: hs-100313189
What tokenizer would I want to mach on a query for 100313189?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Klaas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 7:13 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re:
On 1/10/07, Phil Rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do I need to change my tokenizer for "text" fields or "query"? Or is it a
worddeliminator issue?
Ideally, _no_ tokenization should occur for fields on which you wish
to facet. You can declare the field to be multivalued and still add
many non-t
Im not sure if my issue is with tokenizer or worddeliminator but here is
my problem. I have a multi value field called "styles".
Given the values: style1, style2, style3 when I ask for facets on style I
get back:
1
1
1
1
When what I would want is:
1
1
1
Do I need to change
On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 22:50 -0500, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> Thanks Thorsten,
>
> Knowing nothing about cocoon and little about forrest, I'm not sure
> exactly what this does :-)
>
jeje, fair enough.
You know forrest from the solr webpage. What I did is a small generic
way to access the solr serve
One could do a very loose coupling by just pointing Solr at the index
created by Compass, and send a commit command to solr whenever you
want a new view of the index.
-Yonik
On 1/10/07, Jochen Franke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Currently I'm investigating different Lucene based
search technologi
Currently I'm investigating different Lucene based
search technologies.
For the indexing of our object model my favorite
is Compass because of the Object/Search Engine Mapping
capabilities.
At the same time Solr offers serveral nice features
like faceted search and caching.
Has anybody integrate
