: The issue is best described with an example:
: search for canon - matches multiple categories, which will have very
: different schemas
: http://cnet.search.com/search?chkpt=astg.cnet.fd.search.cnet&q=canon&tag=srch
I just so happen to have a bit of insight into how that page works, and
while i
On 1/4/07, escher2k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yonik,
I have my own Similarity and now need to write my own Scorer for muti
field scoring.
Is extending DisMaxQueryScorer the way to go ?
Hmm, have you checked out DisjunctionSumQuery from lucene? I think it
might be close to what you are loo
Yonik,
I have my own Similarity and now need to write my own Scorer for muti
field scoring.
Is extending DisMaxQueryScorer the way to go ?
Thanks.
Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
> On 1/3/07, escher2k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>I only saw options to specify the default operator (AND|OR) and to
: it sure seems to me that if SOLR is returning XML, it might as well return
: XML with real markup through and through instead of exploiting
: pseudo-markup. if there is concern about introducing validation errors, then
: perhaps you could use namespaces in the XML and put the highlighting markup
Original problem statement:
--
I'm considering using Solr to replace an existing bare-metal Lucene
deployment - the current Lucene setup is embedded inside an existing
monolithic webapp, and I want to factor out the search functionality
into a separate webapp so it can be reused more e
On 1/4/07, Luis Neves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yonik Seeley wrote:
> Off the top of my head, one could use a priority queue that can change
> it's size dynamically. One could increment a group count for each hit
> (like faceted search with the FieldCache) and if the group count
> exceeds "n",
Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 1/3/07, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
thanks. Yes, the presentation layer could group results, but that is
not practical if i want to show the first 20 results out of 200,000
matches.
Nutch groups the results by site. Any idea how they do it?
Good question.
Thanks Chris.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FederatedSearch
Thats useful & I might be getting close to that size soon.
The issue is best described with an example:
search for canon - matches multiple categories, which will have very
different schemas
http://cnet.search.com/search?chkpt
just to add a note on this, the whole idea of inserting "pseudo-markup" into
XML text elements seems to be pretty much in disrepute, and certainly caused
many complaints about RSS 1.0, see e.g.
http://www.biglist.com/lists/xsl-list/archives/200505/msg00316.html
in xsl, you **can** use disable-ou
Chris Hostetter wrote:
For your purposes, if you've got a system that works and does the Document
conversion for you, then you are probably right: Solr may not be a usefull
addition to your architecture. Solr doesn't really attempt to solve the
problem of parsing differnet kinds of data streams
10 matches
Mail list logo
