Re: Negative boosts

2006-12-14 Thread Chris Hostetter
: > function that will give me a bigger boost for field values closer to : > zero? : : The syntax could possibly change in the future, but look at the syntax in : the javadoc for parseFunction in : http://incubator.apache.org/solr/docs/api/org/apache/solr/search/QueryParsing.html : : Then when us

Re: solr index reusable with nutch?

2006-12-14 Thread Chris Hostetter
: In my use case I need the reverse. Nutch searches the index created by : my solr application. The application is just one component in the portal : and the portal will provide a "global" search engine which should use : the index from solr. If you have a compatible schema, then it should be pos

Re: Negative boosts

2006-12-14 Thread Yonik Seeley
On 12/14/06, Derek Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you want documents returned in the same order as a field, it's > easy... you sort! > If you want the value of a field to influence a score, not determine > the exact sort order, you can use FunctionQuery (currently hacked into > the quer

Re: Negative boosts

2006-12-14 Thread Derek Watson
If you want documents returned in the same order as a field, it's easy... you sort! If you want the value of a field to influence a score, not determine the exact sort order, you can use FunctionQuery (currently hacked into the query parser as _val_:myfield) That seems like what I want -- boost

Re: Negative boosts

2006-12-14 Thread Yonik Seeley
On 12/14/06, Derek Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have been developing a new search application based on Solr (Very nice!) using dismax. We are using query-time boosts to provide better search results for user queries and index-time boosts to promote certain documents over others. My questi

Negative boosts

2006-12-14 Thread Derek Watson
Hello, I have been developing a new search application based on Solr (Very nice!) using dismax. We are using query-time boosts to provide better search results for user queries and index-time boosts to promote certain documents over others. My question is about the latter: We have a "position" f