On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 07:45 -0800, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Solr should be able to search any Lucene index,
ok, good to know. :)
So can I guess that the same is true for nutch? Meaning the index solr
is creating could be used by a nutch searcher.
> not just those created by Solr itse
: Despite considerations of stemming and such for "text"
: type fields, is it the case that
: if we have a single value "text" type field,
: will sorting work, though?
correct ... KeywordTokenizer with Filters of your choice should produce a
sortable string of whatever form you desire.
-Hoss
Oh, and yet another way to get around it (with it's own trade offs) is
to use something like fieldtype textTight in the example schema.xml,
which catenates all word parts in both the index analyzer and query
analyzer.
This would index as "upanddownmysitecom" and allow the following
queries to mat
On 12/13/06, Wade Leftwich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've run into some unexpected case sensitivity on searches, at least
unexpected by me.
If you index a text field containing this sentence:
A sentence containing CamelCase words by [EMAIL PROTECTED] is found
at StudlyCaps.org
The document wi
Also, avoid stemming URLs. I used a stemmer that turned my
"best.com" URL into "good.com". The Lucene StandardAnalyzer
works pretty hard to avoid that. --wunder
On 12/13/06 9:33 PM, "Otis Gospodnetic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When indexing (and searching), make sure you are using an Analyzer
When indexing (and searching), make sure you are using an Analyzer that
lower-cases (or upper-cases) tokens.
These are from Lucene, so Solr has them, too:
./src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/LowerCaseTokenizer.java
./src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/LowerCaseFilter.java
Otis
- Origi
I've run into some unexpected case sensitivity on searches, at least
unexpected by me.
If you index a text field containing this sentence:
A sentence containing CamelCase words by [EMAIL PROTECTED] is found
at StudlyCaps.org
The document will be found by searching for "camelcase" but not for
"[E
thanks for the advice. I implemented option #2, followed the directions on:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute
and made:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-82
The only change I might make is to have the schema store if it has fields
with default values so that DocumentBuilder.g
Despite considerations of stemming and such for "text"
type fields, is it the case that
if we have a single value "text" type field,
will sorting work, though?
--tracey
On 9/11/06, Tom Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks also for the "multiValued" explanation, this is useful for
my curr
: Is there a way to automatically set a field when a document is indexed?
: Specifically, I'd like to have a date field updated to the current time when
: a document is indexed.
Your message reminded me that i never announced the new "Date Match"
parsing code, which does let you say something lik
(I have this nasty habit of commiting cool things to Solr that should be
announced on solr-user, and then deciding I'll wait untill they are in a
nightly snapshot before I send an email about them -- and then forgetting
that I never sent the mail).
A while back I added some functionality to the D
Hi,
Solr should be able to search any Lucene index, not just those created by Solr
itself, as long as you configure it properly via schema.xml. Thus, you should
be able to use Solr to search an index created by Nutch. Haven't tried it. It
would be nice if you could contribute the configurati
Hi all,
is it possible to directly use the solr index in nutch?
My client is creating a portal search based on nutch. In this portal
there is as well my project and ATM I prefer to go with solr instead of
nutch since it its much better for my use case.
Now the question is whether the portal sear
13 matches
Mail list logo
