Cool...
I don't believe into any "real-time" for enterprise. Everything is measured
by response time, which is very good in case of 0.5-3 seconds, and
acceptable for up to 10 seconds...
BEA offers 'real-time' WebLogic, JRockit uses 'determenistic garbage
collection'.
Indeed, we have 'asynchronous'
On 12/8/06, Andrew Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello, me again.
I have been running some extensive tests of my search engine and have
been seeing inaccuracies with the "numFound" attribute. It tends to
return 1 more than what is actually show in the XML.
Is this a bug, or could I be doing
Hello, me again.
I have been running some extensive tests of my search engine and have
been seeing inaccuracies with the "numFound" attribute. It tends to
return 1 more than what is actually show in the XML.
Is this a bug, or could I be doing something wrong?
I have a specific example in fr
Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Dec 8, 2006, at 2:15 PM, Andrew Nagy wrote:
My data is 492,000 records of book data. I am faceting on 4 fields:
author, subject, language, format.
Format and language are fairly simple as their are only a few unique
terms. Author and subject however are much differe
: Unfortunately which strategy will be chosen is currently undocumented
: and control is a bit oblique: If the field is tokenized or multivalued
: or Boolean, the FilterQuery method will be used; otherwise the
: FieldCache method. I expect I or others will improve that shortly.
Bear in mind, wh
On Dec 8, 2006, at 2:15 PM, Andrew Nagy wrote:
My data is 492,000 records of book data. I am faceting on 4
fields: author, subject, language, format.
Format and language are fairly simple as their are only a few
unique terms. Author and subject however are much different in
that there are
J.J. Larrea wrote:
Unfortunately which strategy will be chosen is currently undocumented and
control is a bit oblique: If the field is tokenized or multivalued or Boolean,
the FilterQuery method will be used; otherwise the FieldCache method. I expect
I or others will improve that shortly.
On 12/8/06, J.J. Larrea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Unfortunately which strategy will be chosen is currently undocumented and
control is a bit oblique: If the field is tokenized or multivalued or Boolean,
the FilterQuery method will be used; otherwise the FieldCache method.
If anyone had time
Andrew Nagy, ditto on what Yonik said. Here is some further elaboration:
I am doing much the same thing (faceting on Author etc.). When my Author field
was defined as a solr.TextField, even using solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory so it
wasn't actually tokenized, the faceting code chose the QueryFilt
Yonik Seeley wrote:
Are they multivalued, and do they need to be.
Anything that is of type "string" and not multivalued will use the
lucene FieldCache rather than the filterCache.
The author field is multivalued. Will this be a strong performance issue?
I could make multiple author fields as
On 12/8/06, Andrew Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chris Hostetter wrote:
>: Could you suggest a better configuration based on this?
>
>If that's what your stats look like after a single request, then i would
>guess you would need to make your cache size at least 1.6 million in order
>for it to
Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Could you suggest a better configuration based on this?
If that's what your stats look like after a single request, then i would
guess you would need to make your cache size at least 1.6 million in order
for it to be of any use in improving your facet speed.
Would th
On 12/8/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: My data is 492,000 records of book data. I am faceting on 4 fields:
: author, subject, language, format.
: Format and language are fairly simple as their are only a few unique
: terms. Author and subject however are much different in that
: Here are the stats, Im still a newbie to SOLR, so Im not totally sure
: what this all means:
: lookups : 1530036
: hits : 2
: hitratio : 0.00
: inserts : 1530035
: evictions : 1504435
: size : 25600
those numbers are telling you that your cache is capable of holding 25,600
items. you have attem
Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 12/8/06, Andrew Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I changed the filterCache to the following:
However a search that normally takes .04s is taking 74 seconds once I
use the facets since I am faceting on 4 fields.
The first time or subsequent times?
Is your filterCa
On 12/8/06, Andrew Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I changed the filterCache to the following:
However a search that normally takes .04s is taking 74 seconds once I
use the facets since I am faceting on 4 fields.
The first time or subsequent times?
Is your filterCache big enough yet? Wha
Yonik Seeley wrote:
1) facet on single-valued strings if you can
2) if you can't do (1) then enlarge the fieldcache so that the number
of filters (one per possible term in the field you are filtering on)
can fit.
I changed the filterCache to the following:
However a search that normally t
17 matches
Mail list logo
