I was at the origin of the thread you mentionned; I still didnt made any
progress toward integrating a spell suggestion function in Solr; but
then again, I'm a java and a lucene novice (though I'm learning fast
thanks to all the help on the mailing list!). By all means, if you think
you can do
: > This seems like a poor choice for an element
: > name. Why not just name the element what is in the "name" attribute?
: > It would make parsing much easier!
:
: When the XML was first conceived, there was a preference for limiting
: the number of tags.
: The structure could have been inverted
On 12/7/06, Andrew Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On complaint about the faceting though: Why is the element that is
returned called "1st".
I think maybe you are seeing lst (it starts with an L, not a one).
It is short for NamedList, an ordered list who's elements are named.
This seems like
Yonik Seeley wrote:
1) facet on single-valued strings if you can
2) if you can't do (1) then enlarge the fieldcache so that the number
of filters (one per possible term in the field you are filtering on)
can fit.
I wll try this out.
3) facet counts are limited to the results of the query, fi
On 12/7/06, Andrew Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In September there was a thread [1] on this list about heterogeneous
facets and their performance. I am having a similar issue and am
unclear as the resolution of this thread.
I performed a search against my dataset (492,000 records) and got th
In September there was a thread [1] on this list about heterogeneous
facets and their performance. I am having a similar issue and am
unclear as the resolution of this thread.
I performed a search against my dataset (492,000 records) and got the
results I am looking for in .3 seconds. I then
: I looked at the XSD and there is one thing I don't understand:
:
: If the desired way is to conform to the XSD (and hence the types used in XSD),
: then how would it possible to use user-defined fieldtypes as plugins?
Wouldn't
: they violate the same principle?
The XSD is intended to match th
On 12/7/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wonder if the license is compatible with ASD
http://www.terracotta.org/confluence/display/orgsite/Text+of+Terracotta+Public+License
The problematic part might be the attribution requirements.
I have verified (via legal-discuss) that the att
I wonder if the license is compatible with ASD
http://www.terracotta.org/confluence/display/orgsite/Text+of+Terracotta+Public+License
The problematic part might be the attribution requirements.
Otherwise, the ASF board has determined that MPL binaries are OK for
redistribution as long as they hav
Otis, very cool find indeed. This is certainly worth exploring for SOLR,
especially for the CNET guys and anybody else already using multiple
master/slave configurations.
After watching the video I may have to try it out myself.
Brian
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
>
> Now that Terracotta JVM clu
On 12/7/06, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now that Terracotta JVM clustering has been open-sourced (and works with
Lucene's RAMDirectory), who is going to be the first to write something to
support HA Solr? :)
I'm very skeptical of the performance of such a solution.
If I unde
Now that Terracotta JVM clustering has been open-sourced (and works with
Lucene's RAMDirectory), who is going to be the first to write something to
support HA Solr? :)
http://www.terracotta.org/
http://orionl.blogspot.com/
If I understand the significance of this, this means more or less real-t
On 12/7/06, Duane Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All,
I don't have a firewall configured in my environment and I'm trying
to add a layer of security such that requests to solr are only
accepted from the localhost. I could live with user authentication,
but IP-based access control is preferable
Thank you all for the quick responses. They were very helpful.
My XML is well-formed, so I ended up implementing my own FieldType:
public class XMLField extends TextField {
public void write(XMLWriter xmlWriter, String name, Fieldable f) throws
IOException {
xmlWriter.writePrim("xml", name
All,
I don't have a firewall configured in my environment and I'm trying
to add a layer of security such that requests to solr are only
accepted from the localhost. I could live with user authentication,
but IP-based access control is preferable for our needs. This veers
into jetty conf
15 matches
Mail list logo
