: I even know of a company which mere existence is based partly on Solr. :)
now *that* sounds like i story i'd like to hear more of
-Hoss
: I'll bet Hoss & Yonik's paycheck on it. ;-)
: P.S. Hoss & Yonik - just kidding, but couldn't resist. Many kudos to your
: efforts on this.
I can't speak for Yonik, but I take no offense -- I bet my paycheck on
Solr every day :)
: > and hopefully for lots of following projects but I'm a bit
Hi Simon -
We're running Solr in production, and it's rock solid. Of course you can't
really just take an anonymous word for it, but I would honestly put this
stack up against any other system you can find, open source or commercial.
Run it for yourself and you'll be alarmed at how sound it is,
Ok, so hopefully I resolved my problems posting to this mailing list and
this won't show up in some thread, but as a new topic!
Is it possible in any way to use the MoreLikeThis class with solr
(http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/api/org/apache/lucene/search/similar/MoreLikeThis.html)?
Right n
: Maybe something like q.op or q.oper if it *only* applies to q. Which
: begs the question... what *does* it apply to? At first blush, it
: doesn't seem like it should apply to other queries like fq, facet
: queries, and esp queries defined in solrconfig.xml. I think that
: would be very surpri
On 9/11/06, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sep 10, 2006, at 10:47 PM, Michael Imbeault wrote:
> I'm still a little disappointed that I can't change the OR/AND
> parsing by just changing some parameter (like I can do for the
> number of results returned, for example); adding a OR bet
Hello Erik,
Thanks for add that feature! "do" is fine with me, if "op" is already
used (not sure about this one).
Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Sep 10, 2006, at 10:47 PM, Michael Imbeault wrote:
I'm still a little disappointed that I can't change the OR/AND
parsing by just changing some parameter
On Sep 10, 2006, at 10:47 PM, Michael Imbeault wrote:
I'm still a little disappointed that I can't change the OR/AND
parsing by just changing some parameter (like I can do for the
number of results returned, for example); adding a OR between each
word in the text i want to compare sounds s
On 9/9/06, Michael Imbeault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The main problem was that addIndex was sending 1 doc at a time to solr;
it would cause a problem after a few thousand docs because i was running
out of resources.
Sending one doc at a time should be fine... you shouldn't run out of
resource
Hi Simon,
...are there solr servers in production...
You can see a list at http://wiki.apache.org/solr/PublicServers -
there's some solid stuff running on Solr already!
-Bertrand
I know about a number of production installations.
I even know of a company which mere existence is based partly on Solr. :)
There is also a public list of production installations available on the
homepage and/or Wiki.
Eivind
CNET has been using SOLR in production for quite some time. There are others
on this list-serv that can elaborate way beyond me.
On 9/11/06, Simon Willnauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I almost convinced my boss to use Solr in production for a new project
and hopefully for lots of follow
Hello,
I almost convinced my boss to use Solr in production for a new project
and hopefully for lots of following projects but I'm a bit confused
that there is no release available for download. Is Solr still in a
beta state, are there solr servers in production. Is it recommendable
to use it in
On 9/11/06, Tom Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks also for the "multiValued" explanation, this is useful for
my current application. But then, if I use this field and I ask for
sorting, how will the sorting be done, alphanumeric on the first
entry for this field ? Until now, I entered mo
Hello Yonik,
You are right about the string stuff, I saw while turning on the
debugging a few minutes ago, that it is splitting the md5 sum up in
several parts, eacht time we have a number after a letter or the
other way round.
Thanks also for the "multiValued" explanation, this is us
On 9/11/06, Tom Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
have a strange response in a query with sorting.
I sort on a field which is :
I think you probably want a type="string" instead. Text fields have
text analysis (stemming, lowercasing, word splitting, etc) and aren't
used for
Hello,
have a strange response in a query with sorting.
I sort on a field which is :
multiValued="true"/>
in this field mostly 32 byte md5's are saved, mostly only a single
entry but also up to 5.
when I do a search like this : "+testfield:
(fde34c51739462d9486140601dcfb7bf 63a
17 matches
Mail list logo
