Yonik Seeley wrote:
Your'e right, it does look possible that position info can be lost.
The fix probably isn't as simple as copying the position increment in
newTok()... the original increment should only be copied for the first
token generated.
If something like
for (int i = 1, max = queue.
Hi Solr users,
Does Solr support/or will in the future base64 encoded XML documents so
that binary blobs can be added to the index?
I have been using this solr client by Darren Vengroff successfully. It
easily plugs-in into the Solr package and could also use binary
functions in org.apache.solr
On 7/4/06, Eric Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just noticed that in the newTok method in the WordDelimiterFilter, the
"position increment" of the token doesn't seem to be copied?
Your'e right, it does look possible that position info can be lost.
The fix probably isn't as simple as copying the
Just noticed that in the newTok method in the WordDelimiterFilter, the
"position increment" of the token doesn't seem to be copied?
