Re: Interest in Extending SOLR

2006-04-15 Thread Yonik Seeley
On 4/15/06, Bryzek.Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Translate a table design in the database to an XML document that > only defined the fields and their types for that table Just so anyone new to Lucene/Solr isn't mislead by this thread... Lucene (and hence Solr) documents don't need to b

RE: Interest in Extending SOLR

2006-04-15 Thread Bryzek.Michael
I defined objectTypes as: * Share almost everything in the global schema file (e.g. caching, dynamic fields, field types, etc.) * Each objectType defined its own set of available fields This allowed me to easily index completely different types of objects w/ NO way to query across the differ

RE: Interest in Extending SOLR

2006-04-15 Thread Bryzek.Michael
Yonik already added support for multiple webapp instances (with unique schemas) to the Near Term task list ... i've also added a brainstorming page to the wiki with some ideas for implimenting index partitioning to the "Ideas for the future" section... http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TaskList

Re: Deleting documents

2006-04-15 Thread Marcus Stratmann
Yonik Seeley wrote: > OK, I think I fixed this bug. Haven't added a test case yet... In our test case everything works properly now. Thanks for the quick bugfix! Marcus