I think this could be done, and then an SQL styled update command could also be
enabled.
- Original Message
From: Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 1:52:04 PM
Subject: selective field updating
While I know the answer to this
:
: While I know the answer to this when it comes to direct Lucene usage,
: I'm curious if Solr could eventually get to the point of allowing
: clever updating of a document such that the client could only pass a
: specific field to add or update in an existing document and Solr
: could do what it
While I know the answer to this when it comes to direct Lucene usage,
I'm curious if Solr could eventually get to the point of allowing
clever updating of a document such that the client could only pass a
specific field to add or update in an existing document and Solr
could do what it take
Now *that* is an interesting idea! It is similar to the approach I
want to go with a Solr Ruby library, such that all the HTTP stuff is
hidden behind a clean domain-specific language of sorts.
Erik
On Apr 10, 2006, at 4:10 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Sure, I realize I could cr
: Sure, I realize I could create the Lucene index myself, but like the
: higher level abstraction that Solr is providing.
Sorry, i guess i didn't explain myself very well.
My point was that it should be possible to write a Java API which updated
a Solr index (using SolrCore and all of the built
Sure, I realize I could create the Lucene index myself, but like the
higher level abstraction that Solr is providing.
The disadvantage to creating the Lucene index myself or even with a
Solr capability to take a Lucene Document is I'd lose the schema.xml
goodness of things like and would h
On 4/10/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> : In looking at the code, it looks like it'd be difficult to do this
> : without actually doing an HTTP POST. Or is there a clean way to
> : leverage Solr's infrastructure without POSTing into it? I don't even
> : need Solr running while in
: In looking at the code, it looks like it'd be difficult to do this
: without actually doing an HTTP POST. Or is there a clean way to
: leverage Solr's infrastructure without POSTing into it? I don't even
: need Solr running while indexing. Is this possible easily? If so
: what API should I b
On 4/10/06, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm refactoring a command-line application that indexes RDF data to
> index into Solr rather than directly into a Lucene index.
>
> In looking at the code, it looks like it'd be difficult to do this
> without actually doing an HTTP POST. Or is
On 4/10/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> : Is there any way to explicitly add a record using Solr, such that the
> : add will fail if a record already exists with the same value in the
> : unique ID field (as specified by the schema's uniqueKey field)?
>
> I was going to say over
I'm refactoring a command-line application that indexes RDF data to
index into Solr rather than directly into a Lucene index.
In looking at the code, it looks like it'd be difficult to do this
without actually doing an HTTP POST. Or is there a clean way to
leverage Solr's infrastructure wi
11 matches
Mail list logo
