[slurm-users] Large memory jobs stuck Pending. Should use --time parameter?

Greetings, We are new to Slurm and we are trying to better understand why we’re seeing high-mem jobs stuck in Pending state indefinitely. Smaller (mem) jobs in the queue will continue to pass by the high mem jobs even when we bump priority on a pending high-mem job way up. We have been reading ov

[slurm-users] Re: Large memory jobs stuck Pending. Should use --time parameter?

at the job is > pending? If you do squeue or scontrol show job it should list the reason > why its pending. If its Resources, then the scheduler is waiting for > sufficient resources to free up to scheduler. If its is Priority then the > job is pending due to other jobs ahead of it. >

[slurm-users] Re: [External] Is there a way to list allocated/unallocated resources defined in a QoS?

Hi Alistair, I was holding off replying in the hope someone would have a good answer. In lieu of that, here’s my partial answer: When I looked at trying to report per-user and per-group qos values a few months I discovered that SLURM reports the information via this command: scontrol -o show a

[slurm-users] need to set From: address for slurm

All, When the slurm daemon is sending out emails, they are coming from “sl...@servername.subdomain.domain.edu”. This has worked okay in the past, but due to a recent mail server change (over which I have no control whatsoever) this will no longer wo

[slurm-users] Re: need to set From: address for slurm

ase we use postfix and we set smtp_generic_maps to accomplish this. -Paul Edmon- On 6/7/2024 3:33 PM, Vanhorn, Mike via slurm-users wrote: All, When the slurm daemon is sending out emails, they are coming from “sl...@servername.subdomain.domain.edu<mailto:sl...@servername.subdomain.domain.edu