Re: [slurm-users] Meaning of "defunct" in description of Slurm parameters

2020-07-20 Thread Kevin Buckley
On 2020/07/20 20:26, Riebs, Andy wrote: Ummm... unless I'm missing something obvious, though the choice of the term "defunct" might not be my choice (I would have expected "deprecated"), it seems quite clear that the new "SlurmctldHost" parameter has subsumed the 4 that you've listed. I wasn't

Re: [slurm-users] Meaning of "defunct" in description of Slurm parameters

2020-07-20 Thread Paul Edmon
My guess if I had to hazard one is that they wanted to simplify how you define who the controller is.  With the previous method you could define it in conflicting ways.  This method is less prone to mistakes. That's at least my read of it. -Paul Edmon- On 7/20/2020 8:26 AM, Riebs, Andy wrote:

Re: [slurm-users] Meaning of "defunct" in description of Slurm parameters

2020-07-20 Thread Riebs, Andy
Ummm... unless I'm missing something obvious, though the choice of the term "defunct" might not be my choice (I would have expected "deprecated"), it seems quite clear that the new "SlurmctldHost" parameter has subsumed the 4 that you've listed. I wasn't privy to the decision to the discussion a

Re: [slurm-users] Meaning of "defunct" in description of Slurm parameters

2020-07-20 Thread Paul Edmon
Presumably it wouldn't or it may pick up from the history files. I don't know for certain. For that reason it is best to change over to the new definition before you upgrade.  We did that prior to going to 20.02 and had no problem. -Paul Edmon- On 7/19/2020 11:49 PM, Kevin Buckley wrote: At