Re: [slurm-users] Hide Filesystem From Slurm

Thank you everyone! We will Spank it first Thanks, Douglas Duckworth, MSc, LFCS HPC System Administrator Scientific Computing Unit Weill Cornell Medicine 1300 York Avenue New York, NY 10065 E: d...@med.cornell.edu O: 212-746-6305 F: 212-7

Re: [slurm-users] Hide Filesystem From Slurm

We've taken the per-user-namespace approach, as my boss documented here: http://tech.ryancox.net/2013/07/per-user-tmp-and-devshm-directories.html This setup makes sure that all user processes are in their own namespace, whether they're launched by slurm or not.  We do put them inside a subdir of /

Re: [slurm-users] Hide Filesystem From Slurm

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 There are some plugins of one sort or another (at least one is SPANK) that can create a private temporary directory. We've been considering implementing something like this but have not gotten around to it. "systemd" also offers some of this functional

Re: [slurm-users] Hide Filesystem From Slurm

On 7/11/19 8:19 AM, Douglas Duckworth wrote: I am wondering if it's possible to hide a file system, that's world writable on compute node, logically within Slurm.  That way any job a user runs cannot possible access this file system. Essentially we define $TMPDIR as /scratch, which Slurm clea

Re: [slurm-users] Hide Filesystem From Slurm

I don't think that is possible. At least not easily I just symlink /tmp to /scratch on systems I use. That way folks can get used to /scratch, but if anything has hard-coded /tmp, it will still work. Brian Andrus On 7/11/2019 8:19 AM, Douglas Duckworth wrote: Hello I am wondering if it