I believe this behavior is intended as various properties of the jobs that
were requeued no longer match the properties of the rest of the job array.
It might not show on the minimal output you are displaying, but I suspect
the jobs were requeued at different times and so the priorities of the jobs
Hi Jeffrey,
Yes, those jobs (and elements of other array which were also
listed one per line) had indeed been preempted and requeued.
So is this behaviour intended/documented or is it a bug?
Cheers,
Loris
Jeffrey T Frey writes:
> Did those four jobs
>
>
>6577272_21 scavenger PD
Did those four jobs
6577272_21 scavenger PD 0:00 1 (Priority)
6577272_22 scavenger PD 0:00 1 (Priority)
6577272_23 scavenger PD 0:00 1 (Priority)
6577272_28 scavenger PD 0:00 1 (Priority)
run before and get requeued? Seems
Hi,
Does anyone have an idea why pending elements of an array job in one
partition should be displayed compactly by 'squeue' but those of another
in a different partition are displayed one element per line? Please see below
(compact display in 'main', one element per line in 'scavenger').
This is
