: Friday, September 23, 2022 12:24 PM
To: slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com
Subject: Re: [slurm-users] slurmd and dynamic nodes
You don't often get email from toomuc...@gmail.com. Learn why this is
important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
You shouldn't have to change a
ynamic node.
What is the preferred method?
Rob
*From:* slurm-users on behalf
of Brian Andrus
*Sent:* Friday, September 23, 2022 10:24 AM
*To:* slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com
*Subject:* Re: [slurm-users] slurmd and dyna
u handle slurmd running on the dynamic node. What
is the preferred method?
Rob
From: slurm-users on behalf of Brian
Andrus
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2022 10:24 AM
To: slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com
Subject: Re: [slurm-users] slurmd and dynamic nodes
You don&#x
Just off the top of my head here.
I would expect you need to have no jobs currently running on the node,
so you could could submit a job to the node that sets the node to drain,
does any local things needed, then exits. As part of the EpilogSlurmctld
script, you could check for drained nodes
I'm working through how to use the new dynamic node features in order to take
down a particular node, reconfigure it (using nvidia MIG to change the number
of graphic cores available) and give it back to slurm.
I'm at the point where I can take a node out of slurm's control from the master
nod
