Re: [slurm-users] slurm jobs are pending but resources are available

2018-04-19 Thread Marius.Cetateanu
> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 12:50:57 -0400 > From: Michael Di Domenico > To: Slurm User Community List > Subject: Re: [slurm-users] slurm jobs are pending but resources are > available > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" &

Re: [slurm-users] slurm jobs are pending but resources are available

2018-04-17 Thread Benjamin Redling
Hello, Am 16.04.2018 um 18:50 schrieb Michael Di Domenico: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 6:35 AM, wrote: > perhaps i missed something in the email, but it sounds like you have > 56 cores, you have two running jobs that consume 52 cores, leaving you > four free. No. From the original mail: <--- %

Re: [slurm-users] slurm jobs are pending but resources are available

2018-04-16 Thread Michael Di Domenico
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 6:35 AM, wrote: > > According to the above I have the backfill scheduler enabled with CPUs and > Memory configured as > resources. I have 56 CPUs and 256GB of RAM in my resource pool. I would > expect that he backfill >scheduler attempts to allocate the resources in orde

[slurm-users] slurm jobs are pending but resources are available

2018-04-16 Thread Marius.Cetateanu
Hi, I'm having some trouble with resource allocation in the sense that according to how I understood the documentation and applied that to the config file I am expecting some behavior that does not happen. Here is the relevant excerpt from the config file: 60 SchedulerType=sched/backfill