Hi Paul,
I submitted the poll - thanks! For bug #7609, while I'd be happier with a built
in slurm solution, you may find that our jobscript archiver implementation
would work nicely for you. It is very high-performing and has no effect on the
scheduler, or db performance.
The solution is a mu
We have several pending feature requests to SchedMD regarding different
features we would like to see, as I am sure many other groups have. We
were curious if anyone else in the community is interested in these
features and if your group would be interested in talking with us
(Harvard FAS Rese
