Hi,
I'm currently testing an approach similar to the example by Loris.
Why consider preemption? Because, in the original example, if the cluster is
saturated by long running jobs (like 2 weeks), there should be the possibility
to run short jobs right away.
Best,
Thomas
--
slurm-users mailing
thomas.hartmann--- via slurm-users wrote:
> My idea was to basically have three partitions:
>
> 1. PartitionName=short MaxTime=04:00:00 State=UP Nodes=node[01-99]
> PriorityTier=100
> 2. PartitionName=long_safe MaxTime=14-00:00:00 State=UP Nodes=node[01-50]
> PriorityTier=100
> 3. PartitionNam
Le 04/04/2024 à 03:33, Loris Bennett via slurm-users a écrit :
I have never really understood the approach of having different
partitions for different lengths of job, but it seems to be quite
widespread, so I assume there are valid use cases.
However, for our around 450 users, of which about 20
Hi Thomas,
"thomas.hartmann--- via slurm-users"
writes:
> Hi,
> we're testing possible slurm configurations on a test system right now.
> Eventually, it is going to serve ~1000 users.
>
> We're going to have some users who are going to run lots of short jobs
> (a couple of minutes to ~4h) and s
