Re: [slurm-users] QOS time limit tighter than partition limit

2021-12-17 Thread Ross Dickson
Thanks for the suggestions, Samuel. It turns out the root of the problem was elsewhere: Although I had updated slurm.conf with 'AccountingStorageEnforce = associations,limits,qos' and 'scontrol show config' said the same, I had neglected to restart slurmctld, so it *wasn't* actually in effect. I

Re: [slurm-users] QOS time limit tighter than partition limit

2021-12-16 Thread Fulcomer, Samuel
...and you shouldn't be able to do this with a QoS (I think as you want it to), as "grptresrunmins" applies to the aggregate of everything using the QoS. On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 6:12 PM Fulcomer, Samuel wrote: > I've not parsed your message very far, but... > > for i in `cat limit_users` ; do >

Re: [slurm-users] QOS time limit tighter than partition limit

2021-12-16 Thread Fulcomer, Samuel
I've not parsed your message very far, but... for i in `cat limit_users` ; do sacctmgr where user=$i partition=foo account=bar set grptresrunmins=cpu=Nlimit On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 6:01 PM Ross Dickson wrote: > It would like to impose a time limit stricter than the partition limit on > a certa

[slurm-users] QOS time limit tighter than partition limit

2021-12-16 Thread Ross Dickson
It would like to impose a time limit stricter than the partition limit on a certain subset of users. I should be able to do this with a QOS, but I can't get it to work. What am I missing? At https://slurm.schedmd.com/resource_limits.html it says, "Slurm's hierarchical limits are enforced in the