Thank you Bill.
Can you provide anonymized Slurm.conf (I mainly interested in auth
setting), srun launch error and config.log where you saw libssl mention.
Being PMIx plugin developer I’m not aware about any explicit dependencies
from libssl in Slurm. Only thing I can think of would be authentica
Greetings all,
Just wanted to mention I build building the newest slurm on Ubuntu 18.04.
Gcc-7.3 is the default compiler, which means that the various dependencies
(munge, libevent, hwloc, netloc, pmix, etc) are already available and built with
gcc-7.3.
I carefully built slurm-17.11.6 + openmpi
Thanks for your patience and persistence. I’ll find a place to post your
experiences to help others as they navigate these waters.
> On Nov 28, 2017, at 8:52 PM, Philip Kovacs wrote:
>
> I doubled checked and yes, you definitely want the pmix headers and libpmix
> library installed before you
I doubled checked and yes, you definitely want the pmix headers and libpmix
library installed before you configure slurm.No need to use --with-pmix if pmix
is installed in standard system locations. Configure slurm and it will see the
pmix installation. After configuring slurm, but before insta
My apologies - I guess we hadn’t been tracking it that way. I’ll try to add
some clarification. We presented a nice table at the BoF and I just need to
find a few minutes to post it.
I believe you do have to build slurm against PMIx so that the pmix plugin is
compiled. You then also have to spe
Okay, I didn't see any note on the PMIx 2.1 page about versions of slurm
it was combatible with so I assumed all of them. My bad. Thanks for
the correction and the help. I just naively used the rpm spec that was
packaged with PMIx which does enable the legacy support. It seems best
then to
Actually if you're set on installing pmix/pmix-devel from the rpms and then
configuring slurm manually,you could just move the pmix-installed versions of
libpmi.so* and libpmi2.so* to a safe place, configureand install slurm which
will drop in its versions pf those libs and then either use the s
Very true - one of the risks with installing from packages. However, be aware
that slurm 17.02 doesn’t support PMIx v2.0, and so this combination isn’t going
to work anyway.
If you want PMIx v2.x, then you need to pair it with SLURM 17.11.
Ralph
> On Nov 28, 2017, at 2:32 PM, Philip Kovacs wr
This issue is that pmi 2.0+ provides a "backward compatibility" feature,
enabled by default, which installsboth libpmi.so and libpmi2.so in addition to
libpmix.so. The route with the least friction for you would probablybe to
uninstall pmix, then install slurm normally, letting it install its l
Hello, Paul
Please see below.
2017-11-28 13:13 GMT-08:00 Paul Edmon :
> So in an effort to future proof ourselves we are trying to build Slurm
> against PMIx, but when I tried to do so I got the following:
>
> Transaction check error:
> file /usr/lib64/libpmi.so from install of
> slurm-17.02.
So in an effort to future proof ourselves we are trying to build Slurm
against PMIx, but when I tried to do so I got the following:
Transaction check error:
file /usr/lib64/libpmi.so from install of
slurm-17.02.9-1fasrc02.el7.centos.x86_64 conflicts with file from
package pmix-2.0.2-1.el7.ce
11 matches
Mail list logo