Hi Brian,
Thanks for your answer and sorry for my late reply.
Yes, the cluster is not large, perhaps medium sized? What is considered for
Slurm a small/medium/large cluster?
I think I would go for the remote license method, to avoid what you
mentioned about keeping the slurm.conf consistent on al
Richard,
If you don't have a large cluster, doing the local license method is
actually feasible. The biggest issue is the efforts to ensure all the
nodes have the same slurm.conf and then the traffic when they are all
re-queried to report their status on a reconfigure.
That said, I have had
Hi all,
I have to change our set up to be able to update the total number of
available licenses due to users checking out licenses interactively.
We now use Local Licenses, and could just regularly update slurm.conf and
reconfigure, but I don't think that is the best solution.
I see there are at
