sers on behalf of Michael
Gutteridge
Sent: 16 April 2019 16:43
To: Slurm User Community List
Subject: Re: [slurm-users] Effect of PriorityMaxAge on job throughput
(sorry, kind of fell asleep on you there...)
I wouldn't expect backfill to be a problem since it shouldn't be starting
ty factors, please? I've
> attached a copy of the slurm.conf just in case you or anyone else wants to
> take a more complete overview.
>
> Best regards,
> David
>
> --------------
> *From:* slurm-users on behalf of
> Michael Gutteridge
> *Sent:* 09 April 2019 18:59
&
rs, please? I've attached
a copy of the slurm.conf just in case you or anyone else wants to take a more
complete overview.
Best regards,
David
From: slurm-users on behalf of Michael
Gutteridge
Sent: 09 April 2019 18:59
To: Slurm User Community List
Subjec
It might be useful to include the various priority factors you've got
configured. The fact that adjusting PriorityMaxAge had a dramatic effect
suggests that the age factor is pretty high- might be worth looking at that
value relative to the other factors.
Have you looked at PriorityWeightJobSize?
Hello,
I've finally got the job throughput/turnaround to be reasonable in our cluster.
Most of the time the job activity on the cluster sets the default QOS to 32
nodes (there are 464 nodes in the default queue). Jobs requesting nodes close
to the QOS level (for example 22 nodes) are scheduled
