Re: [slurm-users] Curious performance results

2021-02-26 Thread Volker Blum
Thank you! I’ll see if this is an option … would be nice. I’ll see if we can try this. Best wishes Volker > On Feb 25, 2021, at 11:07 PM, Angelos Ching > wrote: > > I think it's related to the job step launch semantic change introduced at > 20.11.0, which has been reverted since 20.11.3, see

Re: [slurm-users] Curious performance results

2021-02-25 Thread Angelos Ching
I think it's related to the job step launch semantic change introduced at 20.11.0, which has been reverted since 20.11.3, see https://www.schedmd.com/news.php For details. Cheers, Angelos (Sent from mobile, please pardon me for typos and cursoriness.) > 26/2/2021 9:07、Volker Blum のメール: > > H

[slurm-users] Curious performance results

2021-02-25 Thread Volker Blum
Hi, I am testing slurm 20.11.2 on a local cluster together with Intel MPI 2018.4.274 . 1) On a single node (20 physical cores) and executed manually (no slurm), a particular application runs fine using Intel’s mpirun, execution time for this example: 8.505 s (wall clock). (this is a straigh