Re: [slurm-users] Array jobs vs. many jobs

2019-11-24 Thread Mark Hahn
Quick question that I'm not sure how to find the answer to otherwise: do array jobs have less impact on the scheduler in any way than a whole long list of jobs run the more traditional way? Less startup overhead, anything like that? kinda sorta. I think of array jobs as a bit like Python generat

Re: [slurm-users] Array jobs vs. many jobs

2019-11-22 Thread Christopher Samuel
Hi Ryan, On 11/22/19 12:18 PM, Ryan Novosielski wrote: Quick question that I'm not sure how to find the answer to otherwise: do array jobs have less impact on the scheduler in any way than a whole long list of jobs run the more traditional way? Less startup overhead, anything like that? Slu

Re: [slurm-users] Array jobs vs. many jobs

2019-11-22 Thread Ree, Jan-Albert van
. Regards, -- Jan-Albert From: slurm-users on behalf of Ryan Novosielski Sent: Friday, November 22, 2019 21:18 To: slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com Subject: [slurm-users] Array jobs vs. many jobs Hi there, Quick question that I'm not sure how to fin

[slurm-users] Array jobs vs. many jobs

2019-11-22 Thread Ryan Novosielski
Hi there, Quick question that I'm not sure how to find the answer to otherwise: do array jobs have less impact on the scheduler in any way than a whole long list of jobs run the more traditional way? Less startup overhead, anything like that? Thanks! (we run 17.11 on CentOS 7, but I'm not sure