Re: [slurm-users] "allocated+" status

2018-04-17 Thread Andy Riebs
Hmmm... the man page says of "reduce_completing_frag," "By default if a job is found completing then no jobs are scheduled. If this parameter is used the node in a completing job are taken out of consideration." This feels like it's missing a word or two. The first sentence says that, by def

Re: [slurm-users] "allocated+" status

2018-04-16 Thread Andy Riebs
Thanks Kilian! On 04/16/2018 02:15 PM, Kilian Cavalotti wrote: Hi Andy, On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 8:43 AM, Andy Riebs wrote: I hadn't realized that jobs can be scheduled to run on a node that is still in "completing" state from an earlier job. We occasionally use epilog scripts that can take 3

Re: [slurm-users] "allocated+" status

2018-04-16 Thread Kilian Cavalotti
Hi Andy, On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 8:43 AM, Andy Riebs wrote: > I hadn't realized that jobs can be scheduled to run on a node that is still > in "completing" state from an earlier job. We occasionally use epilog > scripts that can take 30 seconds or longer, and we really don't want the > next job t

[slurm-users] "allocated+" status

2018-04-16 Thread Andy Riebs
I hadn't realized that jobs can be scheduled to run on a node that is still in "completing" state from an earlier job. We occasionally use epilog scripts that can take 30 seconds or longer, and we really don't want the next job to start until the epilog scripts have completed. Other than codin