that, I think you should test with very high numbers for low
> priority nice such as --nice 10.
>
> Regards;
>
> Ahmet M.
>
>
> 14.04.2020 16:18 tarihinde Matteo F yazdı:
> > Hello Lyn, thanks for your reply.
> > I checked my configuration; the Prior
Hello Lyn, thanks for your reply.
I checked my configuration; the PriorityType was set to
"PriorityType=priority/basic" initially, so my tests refer to that
configuration.
After you post, I set it to "PriorityType=priority/multifactor" and ran the
tests again: the results are the same.
I was hoping
Hello there,
I am having problems understanding the slurm scheduler, with regard to the
"nice" parameter.
I have two types of job: one is low priority and uses 4 CPUs (--nice=20),
the other one is high priority and uses 24 CPUs (--nice=10).
When I submit, let's say, 50 low-priority jobs, only 6 ar
irector, HPC
> bba...@tacc.utexas.edu| Phone: (512) 232-7069
> Office: ROC 1.435| Fax: (512) 475-9445
>
>
>
> On 2/6/18, 6:03 AM, "slurm-users on behalf of Christopher Samuel" <
> slurm-users-boun...@lists.schedmd.com on behalf of ch...@csam
Hello there.
I've just set up a small Slurm cluster for our on-premise computation needs
(nothing too exotic, just a bunch of R scripts).
The systems "works" if the sense that users are able to submit jobs, but I
have an issue with resources management: a single user can consume all
resources of
