Re: [slurm-users] Question about memory allocation

2019-12-15 Thread Kraus, Sebastian
ng the status of the nodes, I see RealMemory=120705 AllocMem=1024 FreeMem=309 Sockets=32 Boards=1 The question is why freemem is so much low while allocmem is far less than realmemory? Regards, Mahmood On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 10:12 AM Kraus, Sebastian mailto:sebastian.kr...@tu-berlin.de>> w

Re: [slurm-users] Question about memory allocation

2019-12-15 Thread Kraus, Sebastian
Hi Mahmood, >> will it reserve (looks for) 200GB of memory for the job? Or this is the hard >> limit of the memory required by job? No, this indicates the amount of residual/real memory as reqeusted per node. Your job will be only runnable on nodes that offer at least 200 GB main memory (sum

Re: [slurm-users] srun: job steps and generic resources

2019-12-15 Thread Kraus, Sebastian
sses found | +-+ [user@gpu045 ~]$ exit exit [user@login005 ~]$ scancel 7052366 [user@login005 ~]$ On 12/13/19 11:48 AM, Kraus, Sebastian wrote: > Dear Valantis, > thanks for the exp

Re: [slurm-users] srun: job steps and generic resources

2019-12-13 Thread Kraus, Sebastian
. Juni 135 10623 Berlin Tel.: +49 30 314 22263 Fax: +49 30 314 29309 Email: sebastian.kr...@tu-berlin.de From: Chrysovalantis Paschoulas Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 13:05 To: Kraus, Sebastian Subject: Re: [slurm-users] srun: job steps and generic res

[slurm-users] srun: job steps and generic resources

2019-12-13 Thread Kraus, Sebastian
Dear all, I am facing the following nasty problem. I use to start interactive batch jobs via: srun -ppartition -N1 -n4 --time=00:30:00 --mem=1G -Jjobname --pty /bin/bash -il Then, explicitly starting a job step within such a session via: srun -l hostname works fine. But, as soon as I add a generic