I left out a critical
let task+=1
in that pseudo-loop 😁
griznog
On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 6:44 PM John Hanks wrote:
> No ideas on fixing this in Slurm, but in userspace in the past when faced
> with huge array jobs which had really short jobs like this I've nudged them
> toward batching up arra
No ideas on fixing this in Slurm, but in userspace in the past when faced
with huge array jobs which had really short jobs like this I've nudged them
toward batching up array elements in each job to extend it. Say the user
wants to run 5 tasks, 30 seconds each. Batching those up in groups of
10
