[slurm-users] Re: Slurm-wlm depends on X11?

2025-07-10 Thread Jesse Hayward via slurm-users
Sorry, one last time: Now the same issue is occuring with the package slurmd. What is going on here? On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 5:09 PM Jesse Hayward wrote: > Update: Definitely an apt problem, not a slurm one, apologies. Still > ancient issues from an old gnome-control-center install a prior admi

[slurm-users] Re: Slurm-wlm depends on X11?

2025-07-10 Thread Jesse Hayward via slurm-users
Update: Definitely an apt problem, not a slurm one, apologies. Still ancient issues from an old gnome-control-center install a prior admin did years ago. Sheesh. Did many apt rebuilds and it never complained. Dpkg rebuild + reboot solved the issue. Held packaged. Glad we're moving to Rocky for ou

[slurm-users] Re: Slurm-wlm depends on X11?

2025-07-10 Thread Jesse Hayward via slurm-users
Hi all, Unfortunately still struggling. I am not installing x11 on my compute nodes. Especially not anything Ubuntu has to offer. See attached screenshot. [image: 966c96eb-79c4-4f12-ba23-bf099bb9b1c6.png] Best, Jesse On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 4:55 PM Jesse Hayward wrote: > Thanks, all! > > Your a

[slurm-users] Is DefCpuPerGPU affected by --ntasks-per-gpu?

2025-07-10 Thread Milad Alizadeh via slurm-users
I have defined DefCpuPerGPU for a partition but when a job specifies --ntasks-per-gpu then DefCpuPerGPU is ignored and I only get 1 cpu: ``` #SBATCH --gpus=1 #SBATCH --ntasks-per-gpu=1 ``` Is this the expected behaviour? The man page for DefCpuPerGPU says: "This value is used only if the job didn