On 2025/06/11 12:46, Ratnasamy, Fritz via slurm-users wrote:
We wanted to block users from ssh to a node where there are no jobs
running however it looks like users are able to do so. We have installed
the slurm_pam_adopt_module and set up the slurm.conf accordingly (the same
way we did on our f
Hi Davide,
Davide DelVento writes:
> Thanks Loris,
>
> Am I correct if reading in between the lines you're saying: rather than going
> on with my "soft" limit idea, just use the regular hard limits, being
> generous with
> the default and providing user education instead? In fact that is an
>
Thanks Loris,
Am I correct if reading in between the lines you're saying: rather than
going on with my "soft" limit idea, just use the regular hard limits, being
generous with the default and providing user education instead? In fact
that is an alternative approach that I am considering too.
On W
Hi Davide,
Davide DelVento via slurm-users
writes:
> In the institution where I work, so far we have managed to live
> without mandatory wallclock limits (a policy decided well before I
> joined the organization), and that has been possible because the
> cluster was not very much utilized.
>
> N
In the institution where I work, so far we have managed to live without
mandatory wallclock limits (a policy decided well before I joined the
organization), and that has been possible because the cluster was not very
much utilized.
Now that is changing, with more jobs being submitted and those bei
Oh, that's it! Indeed i have full definition of nodes with board sockets and threads...At some point i hoped to be able to use both types, chosen by jobs, cores for Monte-Carlo or some other 100% numerical jobs, and "cpus" for data analysis jobs that have a lot of IOThanks a lot!!AdrianOn Jun 11, 2
