Re: [slurm-users] multifactor priority calculation

2022-06-13 Thread Williams, Gareth (IM&T, Black Mountain)
Perhaps run 'sprio -l' and 'sprio -lw' to get more insight into the current priority calculation for pending jobs. Gareth -Original Message- From: slurm-users On Behalf Of z1...@arcor.de Sent: Tuesday, 14 June 2022 6:09 AM To: slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com Subject: Re: [slurm-users] mu

Re: [slurm-users] multifactor priority calculation

2022-06-13 Thread z148x
Hello Lyn, only the priority settings I wrote as example are in the slurm config. Maybe I found the missing peace. It looks like the priority (for some jobs?) in the slurm (19.05.5) database is not updated. I retrieve these values via slurmdb over pyslurm. This would be a problem for my purpose

Re: [slurm-users] multifactor priority calculation

2022-06-13 Thread Lyn Gerner
Mike, it feels like there may be other PriorityWeight terms that are non-zero in your config. QoS or partition-related, perhaps? Regards, Lyn On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:55 AM wrote: > > Dear all, > > I noticed different priority calculations by running a pipe, the > settings are for example: > >

Re: [slurm-users] Users do not have local groups when in a SLURM session (but do when 'su-ed')

2022-06-13 Thread Will Furnell - STFC UKRI
Hi all, I was able to solve this issue with thanks to this bug report: https://bugs.schedmd.com/show_bug.cgi?id=13217 Basically I needed to set "LaunchParameters=disable_send_gids" in my configuration and everything started magically working - probably because the controller doesn't have the lo