Hi Drew,
On 12/4/20 11:32 am, Mullen, Drew wrote:
Error: Package: slurm-20.02.4-1.amzn2.x86_64 (/slurm-20.02.4-1.amzn2.x86_64)
Requires: libnvidia-ml.so.1()(64bit
That looks like it's fixed in 20.02.5 (the current release is 20.02.6):
---
Howdy
Im getting this error installing slurm 20.02.4:
Error: Package: slurm-20.02.4-1.amzn2.x86_64 (/slurm-20.02.4-1.amzn2.x86_64)
Requires: libnvidia-ml.so.1()(64bit
# ldconfig -p|grep libnvidia-ml.so.1
libnvidia-ml.so.1 (libc6,x86-64) => /lib64/libnvidia-ml.so.1
I know I'm very late to this thread, but were/are you using the
--allusers flag to sacct? If not, sacct only returns results for the
user running the command (not sure if this is the case for root - I
never need to run sacct as root). This minor detail tripped me up a few
days ago when I was ex
It won't figure it out automatically no. You will need to ensure that
the spec is installing to the same locale as your vendor installed it if
they didn't put it in the default location (/opt isn't the default).
-Paul Edmon-
On 12/4/2020 3:39 PM, Jason Simms wrote:
Dear Ole,
Thanks. I've re
Dear Ole,
Thanks. I've read through your docs many times. The relevant upgrade
section begins with the assumption that you have properly configured RPMs,
so all I'm trying to do is ensure I get to that point. As I noted, a vendor
installed Slurm initially through a proprietary script, though they
Hi Jason,
Slurm upgrading should be pretty simple, IMHO. I've been through this
multiple times, and my Slurm Wiki has detailed upgrade documentation:
https://wiki.fysik.dtu.dk/niflheim/Slurm_installation#upgrading-slurm
Building RPMs is described in this page as well:
https://wiki.fysik.dtu.d
Also, Slurm was built with "/fs/local/pmix-3.2.1" -- does that translate
well to "/share/local/pmix-3.2.1"?
Andy
On 12/4/2020 2:59 PM, Andy Riebs wrote:
Are you sure that /share/local/pmix-3.2.1 exists on the compute nodes?
On 12/4/2020 2:54 PM, Yuengling, Philip J. wrote:
Hi everyone,
I’
Are you sure that /share/local/pmix-3.2.1 exists on the compute nodes?
On 12/4/2020 2:54 PM, Yuengling, Philip J. wrote:
Hi everyone,
I’ve been having difficulty getting the --mpi=pmix_v3 option to work
for me. I can get --mpi=pmi2 to work ok, but I really want to
understand what I’m doing
Hi everyone,
I’ve been having difficulty getting the --mpi=pmix_v3 option to work for me. I
can get --mpi=pmi2 to work ok, but I really want to understand what I’m doing
wrong here. Everything seems to build ok.
$ srun --mpi=list
srun: MPI types are...
srun: pmix
srun: pmix_v3
srun: cray_shas
Usually the slurm.spec file provided doesn't change that much between
versions. What we do here is that we maintain a git repository of our
slurm.spec that we use with our modifications. Then each time Slurm is
released we compare ours against what is provided, and simply modify the
provided o
As root, -a is effectively applied to every command I’m aware of.
--
#BlackLivesMatter
|| \\UTGERS, |---*O*---
||_// the State | Ryan Novosielski - novos...@rutgers.edu
|| \\ University | Sr. Technologist - 973/972.0922 (2x0922) ~*~
Hello all,
Thank you for being such a helpful resource for All Things Slurm; I
sincerely appreciate the helpful feedback. Right now, we are running 20.02
and considering upgrading to 20.11 during our next maintenance window in
January. This will be the first time we have upgraded Slurm, so
underst
Hi Loris,
This is our submit filter for what you're asking. It checks for both --gres
and --gpus
ESLURM_INVALID_GRES=2072
ESLURM_BAD_TASK_COUNT=2025
if ( job_desc.partition ~= slurm.NO_VAL ) then
if (job_desc.partition ~= nil) then
if (string.match(job_desc.partition,"gpgpu") or
s
Hi,
I want to reject jobs that don't specify any GPUs when accessing our GPU
partition and have the following in job_submit.lua:
if (job_desc.partition == "gpu" and job_desc.gres == nil ) then
slurm.log_user(string.format("Please request GPU resources in the
partition 'gpu', " ..
14 matches
Mail list logo
