Re: [slurm-users] sacct -c not honor -M clusrername

This way is an alternative for “-c”. Is it possible make “-c“ work with “-M”? Thanks. Fred 发件人: Sudeep Narayan Banerjee 发送时间: 星期一, 四月 27, 2020 12:33 上午 收件人: Slurm User Community List; Fred Liu 主题: Re: [slurm-users] sacct -c not honor -M clusrername Dear Fred:

Re: [slurm-users] sacct -c not honor -M clusrername

Dear Fred: should be possible sacct --format=user,state --starttime=04/01/19 --endtime=03/31/20 | grep COMPLETED Please let us know if this helps. Thanks & Regards, Sudeep Narayan Banerjee System Analyst | Scientist B Information System Technology Facility Academic Block 5 | Room 110 Indian I

[slurm-users] sacct -c not honor -M clusrername

Hi, Is it possible to get job completion stats per cluster? Thanks. Fred

Re: [slurm-users] not allocating jobs even resources are free

Thanks Brian, As suggested i gone through document and what i understood that the fair tree leads to the Fairshare mechanism and based on that the job should be scheduling. so it mean job scheduling will be based on FIFO but priority will be decided on the Fairshare. i am not sure if both confli