Hi David,
I actually don't know much about cgroups, and I don't have a single-node
cluster.
Here are some cgroup-related settings from my regular Ubuntu 18.04 cluster,
running SLURM 18.08.7
root@cb-admin:~# cat /etc/slurm/slurm.conf | grep -i cgr
ProctrackType=proctrack/cgroup
TaskPlugin=task/cg
Hi Alex.
Thank you very much for taking you time to help me.
Here are the versions of the listed software:
Distro: Ubuntu Server 18.04 LTS
Kernel: 4.15.0-59-generic x86_64 GNU/Linux
systemd: 237-3ubuntu10.25
SLURM: 17.11.2-1build1
So, you guessed right, Alex.
Do you think I should compile the
Hmm.
I've actually never used singleton and merely chained dependencies.
Maybe you can do that as a workaround:
/*waitjob=$(sbatch --hold fakejob.sh |sed 's/Submitted batch job //')*//*
*//*for i in {1..2}; do*//*
*//* echo Submitting $VAULT to run after ${waitjob}*//*
*//* waitjob=$(sbatch
Hi Brian,
Thanks for the suggestion. I tried it out, but I got the same result.
$ sbatch --hold --dependency=singleton ./fakejob.sh
Submitted batch job 26122715
$ sbatch --hold --dependency=singleton ./fakejob.sh
Submitted batch job 26122716
$ sbatch --hold --dependency=singleton ./fakejob.sh
> From: Kevin Buckley
> Sent: August 22, 2019 3:33 AM
> To: slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com
> Cc: Jarno van der Kolk
> Subject: Re: [slurm-users] Dependencies with singleton and after
>
> On 2019/08/22 04:51, Jarno van der Kolk wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am helping a researcher who encountered an u
On 2019/08/22 04:51, Jarno van der Kolk wrote:
Hi,
I am helping a researcher who encountered an unexpected behaviour with dependencies. He uses both
"singleton" and "after". The minimal working example is as follows:
$ sbatch --hold fakejob.sh
Submitted batch job 25909273
$ sbatch --hold fakej
