On 2/26/19 5:49 AM, Marcus Wagner wrote:
If I remember right, there was a discussion lately in this list
regarding the JobAcctGatherType, yet I do not remember the outcame
It used to be that SchedMD would strongly recommend the non-group way of
gathering information, but that never really wor
Hi folks,
Anyone here tried Slurm's message aggregation (MsgAggregationParams in
slurm.conf) at all?
All the best,
Chris
--
Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Berkeley, CA, USA
On 04-03-2019 16:30, Loris Bennett wrote:
On 3/4/19 2:26 PM, Loris Bennett wrote:
Ole Holm Nielsen writes:
We're one of the many Slurm sites which run the slurmdbd database daemon on the
same server as the slurmctld daemon. This works without problems at our site
given our modest load, howeve
You are welcome Loris!
—
Christopher Coffey
High-Performance Computing
Northern Arizona University
928-523-1167
On 2/26/19, 8:16 AM, "slurm-users on behalf of Loris Bennett"
wrote:
Hi Chris,
I had
JobAcctGatherType=jobacct_gather/linux
TaskPlugin=task/affinity
Hello,
Thank you for reminding me about the sbatch "--requeue" option. When I
submit test jobs using this option the preemption and subsequent restart of
a job works as expected. I've also played around with "preemptmode=suspend"
and that also works, however I suspect we won't use that on these
"d
Hi Ole,
Ole Holm Nielsen writes:
> On 3/4/19 2:26 PM, Loris Bennett wrote:
>> Ole Holm Nielsen writes:
>>> We're one of the many Slurm sites which run the slurmdbd database daemon on
>>> the
>>> same server as the slurmctld daemon. This works without problems at our
>>> site
>>> given our mo
On 3/4/19 2:26 PM, Loris Bennett wrote:
Ole Holm Nielsen writes:
We're one of the many Slurm sites which run the slurmdbd database daemon on the
same server as the slurmctld daemon. This works without problems at our site
given our modest load, however, SchedMD recommends to run the daemons on
Hi Ole,
Ole Holm Nielsen writes:
> We're one of the many Slurm sites which run the slurmdbd database daemon on
> the
> same server as the slurmctld daemon. This works without problems at our site
> given our modest load, however, SchedMD recommends to run the daemons on
> separate servers.
>
>
On 3/4/19 1:27 PM, Paul Edmon wrote:
That should work.
It did work as expected :-)
The upgrade though will have to wait until the dbd is actually on a different
server.
Yes, that's the whole point of first migrating slurmdbd to a different
server! Upgrading the Slurm RPMs on the slurmdb
That should work. The upgrade though will have to wait until the dbd is
actually on a different server. We run the ctld and dbd on the same
machine here for the sake of performance. Before the rpm reorg we used
to upgrade only the dbd first and then the ctld but with the reorg I'm
taking a d
10 matches
Mail list logo
