[slurm-users] Limit CPU core and memory based on GPU request

2018-05-23 Thread Trickey, Ron
Our node hardware configuration is as follows: CPU Cores: 20 Memory: 512GB GPUs: 8 With the following srun command: srun --gres=gpu:2 --pty bash We are trying to set Slurm policies for the following conditions: Memory: User gets 32GB (Memory/number of GPUs on node) times number of GPUs

Re: [slurm-users] Question about using topology/tree

2018-05-23 Thread Antonio Lara
Ok, never mind, I think I got it, it seems that scontrol reconfigure was not enough, I also had to restart the slurm daemons and it seems to work now. Regards! El 23/05/18 a las 13:00, Antonio Lara escribió: Hi again, Also, if I write the nodes names wrong in topology.conf (that is, nodes

[slurm-users] sshare: Fairshare=parent leads to multiple entries with NormShares=1

2018-05-23 Thread Loris Bennett
Hi, I have been trying out using 'parent' as a value for Fairshare and 'sshare -a' shows me the following: Account User RawShares NormSharesRawUsage EffectvUsage FairShare -- -- --- --- - -- ro

[slurm-users] Update via 'sacctmgr load'?

2018-05-23 Thread Loris Bennett
Hi, Does anyone know whether one can modify existing account information by making a dump, deleting everything apart from the users to be modified, modifying those uses to get, say Cluster - 'tux':DefaultQOS='long':Fairshare=1:QOS='long,medium,short' Parent - 'root' Account - 'dept01':Descr

Re: [slurm-users] Question about using topology/tree

2018-05-23 Thread Antonio Lara
Hi again, Also, if I write the nodes names wrong in topology.conf (that is, nodes that are not specified in slurm.conf, in the line describing the partition, under "Nodes="), when I do scontrol reconfigure, there is no complaint or messages in the logs, so it seems like the topology.conf file

[slurm-users] Question about using topology/tree

2018-05-23 Thread Antonio Lara
Hello, I'm trying to use the topology/tree plugin to isolate nodes in different "groups", so that jobs can be allocated only on nodes belonging to one such group, and not in nodes from other groups. I think I'm missing something, because Slurm doesn't seem to take this topology into considera

Re: [slurm-users] The job name of today :)

2018-05-23 Thread Bjørn-Helge Mevik
Lev Lafayette writes: > On Tue, 2018-05-22 at 13:56 +0200, Bjørn-Helge Mevik wrote: >> >> (including the newlines!).  Our scripts didn't expect newlines in job >> names, and so became angry. :) >> > > That's beautiful in its ugliness and is going in my introductory > training material. :) :D