On 06/02/2012 06:45 AM, Phil Pennock wrote:
> Someone needs to repoint http://www.nongnu.org/sks/ before the GC site
> goes.
I've done this now, as well as updating the "Homepage" link seen at:
https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/sks/
(since i can never remember how to do this in savannah, it'
On 2012-06-01 at 20:42 -0400, Yaron Minsky wrote:
> The bitbucket transition seems complete. Any objections to deleting the
> google-code project? It seems like a source of confusion...
Someone needs to repoint http://www.nongnu.org/sks/ before the GC site
goes.
8< c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/02/12 00:46, John Marshall wrote:
> On 02/06/2012 10:42, Yaron Minsky wrote:
>> The bitbucket transition seems complete. Any objections to
>> deleting the google-code project? It seems like a source of
>> confusion...
>
> So now we all update
On 02/06/2012 10:42, Yaron Minsky wrote:
> The bitbucket transition seems complete. Any objections to deleting the
> google-code project? It seems like a source of confusion...
So now we all update the "Learn more about SKS" links on our keyserver
web pages.
Old: http://code.google.com/p/sks-ke
The bitbucket transition seems complete. Any objections to deleting the
google-code project? It seems like a source of confusion...
y
___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
On 5/31/12 11:58 AM, John Clizbe wrote:
> Other than the name being somewhat offensive in some English speaking
> countries?
I'm going to chime in here on the side of the "git isn't necessary" crowd.
Git is a fine RCS for large distributed projects. For the Linux kernel
it's almost ideal. But
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1,SHA256
C.J. Adams-Collier wrote:
> No objection aside from never having heard of the bitbucket revision
> control system. Any reason you're not considering something git-based?
>
> Sent from my PDP-11
Other than the name being somewhat offensive in
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:08 PM, John Clizbe wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1,SHA256
>
> Yaron Minsky wrote:
> > John? Seems like you're the main person who I haven't heard a response
> > from. How do you feel about switching to bitbucket?
> >
> Sorry for the late reply
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2012-05-31 05:08, John Clizbe wrote:
> Yaron Minsky wrote:
>> John? Seems like you're the main person who I haven't heard a
>> response from. How do you feel about switching to bitbucket?
>
> Sorry for the late reply, Long weekend at BF's place
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1,SHA256
Yaron Minsky wrote:
> John? Seems like you're the main person who I haven't heard a response
> from. How do you feel about switching to bitbucket?
>
Sorry for the late reply, Long weekend at BF's place. And a slew of catch up
once I got home.
John? Seems like you're the main person who I haven't heard a response
from. How do you feel about switching to bitbucket?
y
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Yaron Minsky wrote:
> My mistake. It is now public, and allows forks and all. Tell me if you
> have any further issues.
>
>
> On Sun,
My mistake. It is now public, and allows forks and all. Tell me if you
have any further issues.
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand <
k...@sumptuouscapital.com> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 2012-05-26 18:49, Yaron Minsky wrote:
> >
> > Mig
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 8:35 PM, David Benfell wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05/26/2012 05:12 PM, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> >
> > Given that (I believe) the source code to sks is already stored in
> > a mercurial repository, it would make sense to use a mercurial
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2012-05-26 18:49, Yaron Minsky wrote:
>
> Migrating the repos themselves is pretty easy, and I've actually
> already done that. Here's the link:
>
> https://bitbucket.org/yminsky/sks-keyserver
>
> Any objections?
No objections from me, at lea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On 2012-05-26 at 17:35 -0700, David Benfell wrote:
> Just for my own idle curiousity, if the complaint about google code's
> hosting is that its pull request architecture is inferior, wouldn't
> that be a criticism of mercurial itself?
Since we'r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/26/2012 06:37 PM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
>
> On May 26, 2012, at 8:35 PM, David Benfell wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 05/26/2012 05:12 PM, Matthew Palmer wrote:
>>>
>>> Given that (I believe) the source co
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 09:37:49PM -0400, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
> On May 26, 2012, at 8:35 PM, David Benfell wrote:
> > On 05/26/2012 05:12 PM, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> >> Given that (I believe) the source code to sks is already stored in
> >> a mercurial repository, it would make sense to use a me
On May 26, 2012, at 8:35 PM, David Benfell wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05/26/2012 05:12 PM, Matthew Palmer wrote:
>>
>> Given that (I believe) the source code to sks is already stored in
>> a mercurial repository, it would make sense to use a mercurial
>> ho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/26/2012 05:12 PM, Matthew Palmer wrote:
>
> Given that (I believe) the source code to sks is already stored in
> a mercurial repository, it would make sense to use a mercurial
> hosting service.
>
Just for my own idle curiousity, if the comp
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 11:05:19PM +0200, Jan Kesten wrote:
> Am 26.05.2012 um 21:35 schrieb "C.J. Adams-Collier" :
> > On May 26, 2012, at 9:49 AM, Yaron Minsky wrote:
> >> I'd like to consider migrating sks to bitbucket. Now that development has
> >> been picking up, with multiple people propo
Bitbucket is GIT ;-)
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
Am 26.05.2012 um 21:35 schrieb "C.J. Adams-Collier" :
> No objection aside from never having heard of the bitbucket revision control
> system. Any reason you're not considering something git-based?
>
> Sent from my PDP-11
>
> On May 26, 2012, a
No objection aside from never having heard of the bitbucket revision control
system. Any reason you're not considering something git-based?
Sent from my PDP-11
On May 26, 2012, at 9:49 AM, Yaron Minsky wrote:
> I'd like to consider migrating sks to bitbucket. Now that development has
> been
I'd like to consider migrating sks to bitbucket. Now that development has
been picking up, with multiple people proposing patches, I've come to think
that bitbucket's pull request infrastructure is sufficiently better than
google code to be worth the migration costs. I think the main pain is in
r
23 matches
Mail list logo
