Thank you, Amadeusz!
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm announcing availability of GNU Screen v.4.6.1
>
> Screen is a full-screen window manager that multiplexes a physical
> terminal between several processes, typically interactive shells.
>
> Th
Hi Prashant,
you can help to test our 4.5.1 beta by using git (development version):
Download sources:
> git clone git://git.savannah.gnu.org/screen.git
> cd screen/src
> git checkout screen-v4
Be sure you use screen-v4 branch:
> git branch
Build and install GNU screen:
> ./autogen.sh
> ./confi
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 07:35:02PM +0200, Amadeusz S??awi??ski wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm announcing availability of GNU Screen v.4.3.0
Thank you for a new release of Screen! I'm excited to try out the new
features!
--
Erik Falor
Registered Linux User #445632http://un
On Monday, December 17, 2012 06:51:55 PM Sadrul Habib Chowdhury wrote:
> Hi! From a quick glance, this looks like a good change. Comments inline:
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> [snip]
> > --- a/src/doc/screen.1
> > +++ b/src/doc/screen.1
> > @@ -3542,6 +3542,15 @@
I second that. Nice features!
Tomas can you please look into Sadrul's question below?
Cheers, JW-
Sadrul Habib Chowdhury wrote:
>Hi! From a quick glance, this looks like a good change. Comments
>inline:
>
>On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Thomas Renninger
>wrote:
>[snip]
>> --- a/src/doc/scre
Hi! From a quick glance, this looks like a good change. Comments inline:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Thomas Renninger wrote:
[snip]
> --- a/src/doc/screen.1
> +++ b/src/doc/screen.1
> @@ -3542,6 +3542,15 @@ Optionally you can put the word \*Qonerror\*U after
> the keys. This will cause sc
>
* mrbro...@juno.com had this to say on [28 Nov 2009, 20:40:42 -0700]:
>
> This patch that I have attached is to add documentation about the new
> mousetrack command that was recently added. It seemed simple and
> straightforward. Comments are welcomed.
Hi! Thank you very much for the patches to u
* Peter Teichman had this to say on [08 Nov 2009, 11:48:51 -0500]:
> I'd like a way to uniquely identify the current screen process while
> evaluating .screenrc. The specific problem I'm trying to solve is tying an
> ssh-agent process to the life of a set of screens.
>
> If I could get the current
Juergen Weigert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said
(on Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 04:55:26PM +0200):
> - compare man and texinfo,
> - bring them back in sync
> - (later) find a tool to generate both from one source
Count me in. I much prefer manpages to texinfo,
so I'm keen to help keep them in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Micah Cowan wrote:
> (My mailer is doing the quoting backwards again)
>
> Tom Scogland wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Tom Scogland wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been a screen user for a few years on
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 06:11:33PM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote:
>> * What about the bloat?
> Screw the bloat, there are larger full-blown window managers around :-)
I don't think that the existence of bloat in *some* solutions for an
unrelated problem domain is an excuse to add bloat to Screen.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 01:01:10AM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote:
>> "M-x term" within Emacs pretty much fits the bill.
> Only a dumb terminal, though :(
> http://hannes.saeurebad.de/images/no-recursive-emacs.png
M-x term is not the same as M-x shell. The former provides VT220 (or
thereabouts) emu
Mark Eichin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Micah Cowan wrote:
>>> To be honest, implementing a Screen within Emacs makes almost as much
>>> sense as giving Screen Emacs-like scriptability
>>
>> Come to think of it, that functionality more-or-less already
Hi,
Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Johannes Weiner wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Micah Cowan wrote:
To be honest, implementing a Screen within Emacs makes almost as much
sense as giving Screen Emacs-like scriptability
>>> Come to think o
Hi,
Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Micah Cowan wrote:
>> To be honest, implementing a Screen within Emacs makes almost as much
>> sense as giving Screen Emacs-like scriptability
>
> Come to think of it, that functionality more-or-less already exists;
> "M-x term" within Emacs pretty mu
Hi Tom,
"Tom Scogland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> All of this is pretty correct, except that the gnu emacs we know was lisp
> with a C core for a long time because redraw was impossible to write
> efficiently enough in lisp for some reason. As such, when the program
> entered that state, ever
Hi,
Sadrul Habib Chowdhury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi. I started working on a lua script loader for screen last night. I am
> quite happy with the progress so far. I would like to know what people
> think about this kind of work. I discussed about this briefly with Micah
> last night, and h
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Trent W. Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 02:16:30PM -0700, Micah Cowan wrote:
> > I'm not sure I agree on "people know them well" for Haskell. Scheme
> > /Lisp probably has a larger developer base than Haskell does.
>
> Last time I looked,
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 02:16:30PM -0700, Micah Cowan wrote:
> I'm not sure I agree on "people know them well" for Haskell. Scheme
> /Lisp probably has a larger developer base than Haskell does.
Last time I looked, on Freenode, #haskell has around double the number
of people that #scheme has. Whi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Micah Cowan wrote:
>>> To be honest, implementing a Screen within Emacs makes almost as much
>>> sense as giving Screen Emacs-like scriptability
>> Come to think of it, tha
Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Micah Cowan wrote:
>> To be honest, implementing a Screen within Emacs makes almost as much
>> sense as giving Screen Emacs-like scriptability
>
> Come to think of it, that functionality more-or-less already exists;
> "M-x term" within Emacs pretty much fi
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Tom Scogland wrote:
> >> While I'm relatively new here I thought I'd throw in my 2 cents on the
> >> matter. Having everything doable via scripting sounds good, but it
> >>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Micah Cowan wrote:
> To be honest, implementing a Screen within Emacs makes almost as much
> sense as giving Screen Emacs-like scriptability
Come to think of it, that functionality more-or-less already exists;
"M-x term" within Emacs pretty much fits
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Scogland wrote:
>> While I'm relatively new here I thought I'd throw in my 2 cents on the
>> matter. Having everything doable via scripting sounds good, but it
>> should be a situation where something is only done in scripting if you
>> want to rep
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > The trend I would like to see is not just extending screen with a
> > powerful language but reducing the C code where possible by this
> > langua
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Johannes Weiner wrote:
> The trend I would like to see is not just extending screen with a
> powerful language but reducing the C code where possible by this
> language. Sort of like it's done with emacs (only that emacs was
> probably written to t
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> (My mailer is doing the quoting backwards again)
>
> Tom Scogland wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Tom Scogland wrote:
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
(My mailer is doing the quoting backwards again)
Tom Scogland wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tom Scogland wrote:
Hi,
I've been a screen user for a few years on linux, but when switching
>>
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Tom Scogland wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I've been a screen user for a few years on linux, but when switching
>> to osx as my primary os not too long ago (long story...) I found the
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Scogland wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been a screen user for a few years on linux, but when switching
> to osx as my primary os not too long ago (long story...) I found the
> current development versions wont build. The issue was just a #ifdef
> that was c
On Jan 16, 08 23:52:26 +0200, Zvi Har'El wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> Thanks, but no thanks. I am not interested in tricks to set
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH. This is not what the screen mailing list about.
>
>
> I am concerned about the fact that screen removes LD_LIBRARY_PATH from the
> environment, and I believe t
On Dec 17, 05 09:55:05 +0100, Rafal Maszkowski wrote:
> I have created [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. Subscription via
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-devel
Thanks!
> Do we need also some screen-announce list?
Hmm. Lets wait for some responses.
Settig up things
On Dec 18, 05 16:44:22 +0100, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 12:42:10AM +0900, pclouds wrote:
> > On 12/19/05, Michael Schroeder
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 08:30:09PM +0900, pclouds wrote:
> > > > I'v read somewhere that screen has stopped devel
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 12:42:10AM +0900, pclouds wrote:
> On 12/19/05, Michael Schroeder
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 08:30:09PM +0900, pclouds wrote:
> > > I'v read somewhere that screen has stopped development, only
> > > maintainance. Is it true?
> >
> > No! Who says
On 12/19/05, Michael Schroeder
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 08:30:09PM +0900, pclouds wrote:
> > I'v read somewhere that screen has stopped development, only
> > maintainance. Is it true?
>
> No! Who says such things?
From http://www.gnu.org/software/screen/, you'll see a li
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 08:30:09PM +0900, pclouds wrote:
> I'v read somewhere that screen has stopped development, only
> maintainance. Is it true?
No! Who says such things?
Micha.
--
Michael Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
main(_){while(_=~getchar())putchar(~_-1/(~(_|32)/13*2-11)*13);}
Rafal Maszkowski wrote:
> I have created [EMAIL PROTECTED] list.
I don't want to fuss, but is this really needed, considering how slow
the screen-users list is? I would really like to keep it to only one
list until the added volume warrants another list.
> Do we need also some screen-announce l
I'v read somewhere that screen has stopped development, only
maintainance. Is it true?
On 12/17/05, Rafal Maszkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have created [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. Subscription via
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-devel
>
> D
I have created [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. Subscription via
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-devel
Do we need also some screen-announce list?
R.
--
Jeżeli upadnie cywilizacja zachodnia, to będzie szansa na odbudowę cywilizacji
chrześcijańskiej. (dr Stanisław Krajski
39 matches
Mail list logo
