Re: fFtT implementation

2005-12-21 Thread Rafal Maszkowski
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 04:38:36PM +0100, Michael Schroeder wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 01:03:34PM +0100, Juergen Weigert wrote: > > On Dec 16, 05 12:39:50 +0100, Rafal Maszkowski wrote: > > > What I plan to do is: > > > - establish screen-devel list > Doesn't make sense as the current list is

Re: [Fwd: Re: fFtT implementation]

2005-12-19 Thread Juergen Weigert
On Dec 16, 05 20:49:51 +, bill wrote: > fileio.c, at line 133: the declaration > int > StartRc(rcfilename, nopanic) > char *rcfilename, int nopanic > is a syntax error for gcc 3.4.4. ( ',' should be ';') > After that change, I was able to compile cleanly. oops, fixed. thanks.

Re: fFtT implementation

2005-12-18 Thread Michael Schroeder
Btw, here's the current status: On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 04:38:36PM +0100, Michael Schroeder wrote: > Planned features for the next release: > > - sending the tty file descriptor from the frontend to the > backend over the unix domain socket, so you won't get error > messages after an 'su' to

Re: fFtT implementation

2005-12-18 Thread Michael Schroeder
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 01:03:34PM +0100, Juergen Weigert wrote: > On Dec 16, 05 12:39:50 +0100, Rafal Maszkowski wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 12:24:19PM +0100, Juergen Weigert wrote: > > > On Dec 15, 05 21:53:55 +0100, Rafal Maszkowski wrote: > > > > > I suggest, I add you as an administrato

Re: [Fwd: Re: fFtT implementation]

2005-12-16 Thread bill
Juergen Weigert wrote: I've pushed all known versions of screen in savanna-cvs The latest 'HEAD' is still very close to 4.0.2 -- just added a few of my backlogging patches. See http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/screen/screen/src/NEWS?rev=HEAD cheers, Jw. fileio.c

Re: [Fwd: Re: fFtT implementation]

2005-12-16 Thread Juergen Weigert
On Dec 16, 05 12:45:50 +0100, Michael Schroeder wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 07:17:23PM +, bill wrote: > > Juergen Weigert wrote: > > >the yahoo-list is dead and shall remain dead. > > > > Does this imply that screen development is also dead? > > No. Just the yahoo mailing list. > > > Wi

Re: [Fwd: Re: fFtT implementation]

2005-12-16 Thread Michael Schroeder
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 07:17:23PM +, bill wrote: > Juergen Weigert wrote: > >the yahoo-list is dead and shall remain dead. > > Does this imply that screen development is also dead? No. Just the yahoo mailing list. > Will it > be possible to get the functionality included? Depends on the pa

Re: fFtT implementation

2005-12-15 Thread bill
Rafal Maszkowski wrote: On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 08:16:26PM +, bill wrote: Well, it's been a little uglier than I expected, but I have put together an initial implementation of the fFtT cursor movement family for cut/paste mode. I need to spend some time cleaning it up, but I'm a little c

[Fwd: Re: fFtT implementation]

2005-12-15 Thread bill
Juergen Weigert wrote: the yahoo-list is dead and shall remain dead. Does this imply that screen development is also dead? Will it be possible to get the functionality included? I don't know what is involved in testing, but the additions are non-intrusive and certainly shouldn't be diff

Re: fFtT implementation

2005-12-15 Thread Buddy Burden
Rafal, Don't you think that vi screen movement in screen is not consistent with original vi controls? E.g. 'W' and 'w'. Maybe we could make it more similar to vi. Yes, I would love that, but I don't think I'm bright enough to do the code myself. I find myself hitting W, E, and B constantly w

Re: fFtT implementation

2005-12-15 Thread Juergen Weigert
On Dec 15, 05 10:38:26 +0100, Rafal Maszkowski wrote: > Some time ago I was said that there is one on yahoo or something. Subscribing > to yahoo list is somewhat complicated and links unfriendly so I have given up > at some stage. Probably it was http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gnu-screen/ - I > thin

Re: fFtT implementation

2005-12-15 Thread Rafal Maszkowski
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 08:16:26PM +, bill wrote: > Well, it's been a little uglier than I expected, but I have put together an > initial implementation of the fFtT cursor movement family for cut/paste mode. > I need to spend some time cleaning it up, but I'm a little curious about the > curren

fFtT implementation

2005-12-14 Thread bill
Well, it's been a little uglier than I expected, but I have put together an initial implementation of the fFtT cursor movement family for cut/paste mode. I need to spend some time cleaning it up, but I'm a little curious about the current state of screen development. There doesn't seem to be a de