On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 02:30:15PM EST, david kerns wrote:
> just type screen ... if you're in a brand new window with no other text..
> you may not notice the subtly
> hit return a few times on a new window.. then type screen .. should be a
> fresh window.. then exit, and you'll get your old scree
just type screen ... if you're in a brand new window with no other text..
you may not notice the subtly
hit return a few times on a new window.. then type screen .. should be a
fresh window.. then exit, and you'll get your old screen back (as screen
exits)
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 12:24 PM M.R.P. z
On 2/19/21 7:50 PM, M.R.P. zensky wrote:
> Hello I have installed screen on linux but how do you start screen?
>
In a terminal. Usually, I add the options -D -r when I run it.
See "man screen"
Once it is running, there won;t be much indication that it is runningm
though you can try,
sc
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Tim Harvey wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I've often asked users I'm helping with modem support on Linux to use
> GNU screen to issue AT
> commands to modems to get their details (ie ATI), however I've noticed
> this doesn't work for me anymore on perhaps newer modems and
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 08:00:01 -0700
> Tim Harvey wrote:
>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I've often asked users I'm helping with modem support on Linux to use
>> GNU screen to issue AT
>> commands to modems to get their details (ie ATI), however I'
On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 08:00:01 -0700
Tim Harvey wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I've often asked users I'm helping with modem support on Linux to use
> GNU screen to issue AT
> commands to modems to get their details (ie ATI), however I've noticed
> this doesn't work for me anymore on perhaps newer modems
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Kipling Inscore wrote:
> While screen is running, the tty (at least if it's a pts) from which
> screen was launched still exists (and is still owned by user, not
> root) but isn't listed by w or who. Perhaps it's something to do with
> how w and who work or what
hu, May 26, 2011 at 07:09, John K. Sherwood wrote:
> The situation I was talking about was the first one:
>
> user$ sudo bash
> password:
> root# screen
>
> I understand that if it is run by root you might expect it to spawn shells
> as the user root; however, if you run the u
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:54, John K. Sherwood wrote:
> Hello all,
> I've been using screen for a while, but recently one of our system
> administrators noticed an interesting quirk of screen that made me wonder.
> It seems that if you run 'screen' after running 'sudo bash', the system (as
With
"Jae Norment" writes:
> I fairly pretty uncomfortable running any of the solutions presented
> here: I know enough about C/C++ to know that it's pretty easy to write
> code that can be pretty destructive to an instance of an operating
> system. The last thing I want to do is bring down the produ
usually read most of what happens, and the
original isn't destroyed in the process, so I always have that, too...
-Original Message-
From: Micah Cowan [mailto:mi...@cowan.name]
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 3:24 AM
To: Jae Norment
Cc: screen-users@gnu.org
Subject: Re: using scre
Hi Jae,
I spent several hours trying to tackle this same issue. I wanted to
share what I found out. I found 2 programs that do a pretty good job in
removing the escape codes:
1. Ansifilter: http://www.andre-simon.de/doku/ansifilter/ansifilter.html
2. Ansi2txt: http://sourceforge.net/proj
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jae Norment wrote:
> I use screen to log sessions where I patch Debian servers. Screen
> captures ANSI control codes (like positioning and color changes), which
> is probably appropriate, however, I want a version of the logs without
> those codes so
sed 's/[^[:space:][:print:]]//g'
or sg similar might do the trick
i once wrote a very small C program (perl was too slow) to check a file for
any non-printable bytes; it would probably be trivial to write a version
that would output printable bytes instead
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 5:52 AM, Jae No
On 8/6/07, Jean Jordaan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Javier
>
> > > They moved me from a jailshell to a normal shell (which I much
> > > appreciated)
> > Oh, this is a new information. It is posible that you was in
> > a restricted environment (chroot or similar), without access
> > to a /dev/pt
On 8/6/07, Jean Jordaan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Javier
>
> > Which operating system?
>
> Linux 2.6.9-42.0.3.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri Oct 6 06:28:26 CDT 2006 x86_64
> x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> > In linux, you must mount devpts filesystem
> > in order to get pseudo-terminals in /dev/pts directory.
Hi Javier
> > They moved me from a jailshell to a normal shell (which I much
> > appreciated)
> Oh, this is a new information. It is posible that you was in
> a restricted environment (chroot or similar), without access
> to a /dev/pts directory
I only realised I was in a jail after they told me.
Hi Javier
> Which operating system?
Linux 2.6.9-42.0.3.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri Oct 6 06:28:26 CDT 2006 x86_64
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> In linux, you must mount devpts filesystem
> in order to get pseudo-terminals in /dev/pts directory. Check /etc/fstab
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [~]# cat /etc/fstab | grep pts
18 matches
Mail list logo
