Re: Killing screens

2007-08-30 Thread David Douthitt
Sam Tardif wrote > Thank you very much for pointing that out! The second sentence of > autodetach was most useful. I guess it pays not to skim man pages :p Nobody can blame you I think - the GNU Screen man page is _how_ _long_? When I went to print it, it was somewhere around 100 pages. > And Bri

Re: Killing screens

2007-08-28 Thread Sam Tardif
Pavel Sanda wrote: Any suggestions? Is there a way to tell screens not to be persistent? Or is this something screen just isn't capable of? the section autodetach on|off in man pages does not help ? pavel Thank you very much for pointing that out! The second sentence of autodetach was

Re: Killing screens

2007-08-27 Thread Brian Mathis
On 8/27/07, Sam Tardif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi screen users, > > We currently use Zterm to communicate with serial devices, but due to > some problems it has I am looking for alternatives. screen was a good > choice, but I have come across a stumbling block that I can't find a way > around.

Re: Killing screens

2007-08-27 Thread Pavel Sanda
> Any suggestions? Is there a way to tell screens not to be persistent? Or > is this something screen just isn't capable of? the section autodetach on|off in man pages does not help ? pavel ___ screen-users mailing list screen-users@gnu.org http://li

Killing screens

2007-08-26 Thread Sam Tardif
Hi screen users, We currently use Zterm to communicate with serial devices, but due to some problems it has I am looking for alternatives. screen was a good choice, but I have come across a stumbling block that I can't find a way around. Basically, user A logs in (on Mac OS X machine), runs