On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 06:11:33PM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote:
>> * What about the bloat?
> Screw the bloat, there are larger full-blown window managers around :-)
I don't think that the existence of bloat in *some* solutions for an
unrelated problem domain is an excuse to add bloat to Screen.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 01:01:10AM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote:
>> "M-x term" within Emacs pretty much fits the bill.
> Only a dumb terminal, though :(
> http://hannes.saeurebad.de/images/no-recursive-emacs.png
M-x term is not the same as M-x shell. The former provides VT220 (or
thereabouts) emu
Mark Eichin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Micah Cowan wrote:
>>> To be honest, implementing a Screen within Emacs makes almost as much
>>> sense as giving Screen Emacs-like scriptability
>>
>> Come to think of it, that functionality more-or-less already
Hi,
Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Johannes Weiner wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Micah Cowan wrote:
To be honest, implementing a Screen within Emacs makes almost as much
sense as giving Screen Emacs-like scriptability
>>> Come to think o
Hi,
Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Micah Cowan wrote:
>> To be honest, implementing a Screen within Emacs makes almost as much
>> sense as giving Screen Emacs-like scriptability
>
> Come to think of it, that functionality more-or-less already exists;
> "M-x term" within Emacs pretty mu
Hi Tom,
"Tom Scogland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> All of this is pretty correct, except that the gnu emacs we know was lisp
> with a C core for a long time because redraw was impossible to write
> efficiently enough in lisp for some reason. As such, when the program
> entered that state, ever
Hi,
Sadrul Habib Chowdhury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi. I started working on a lua script loader for screen last night. I am
> quite happy with the progress so far. I would like to know what people
> think about this kind of work. I discussed about this briefly with Micah
> last night, and h
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Trent W. Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 02:16:30PM -0700, Micah Cowan wrote:
> > I'm not sure I agree on "people know them well" for Haskell. Scheme
> > /Lisp probably has a larger developer base than Haskell does.
>
> Last time I looked,
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 02:16:30PM -0700, Micah Cowan wrote:
> I'm not sure I agree on "people know them well" for Haskell. Scheme
> /Lisp probably has a larger developer base than Haskell does.
Last time I looked, on Freenode, #haskell has around double the number
of people that #scheme has. Whi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Micah Cowan wrote:
>>> To be honest, implementing a Screen within Emacs makes almost as much
>>> sense as giving Screen Emacs-like scriptability
>> Come to think of it, tha
Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Micah Cowan wrote:
>> To be honest, implementing a Screen within Emacs makes almost as much
>> sense as giving Screen Emacs-like scriptability
>
> Come to think of it, that functionality more-or-less already exists;
> "M-x term" within Emacs pretty much fi
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Tom Scogland wrote:
> >> While I'm relatively new here I thought I'd throw in my 2 cents on the
> >> matter. Having everything doable via scripting sounds good, but it
> >>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Micah Cowan wrote:
> To be honest, implementing a Screen within Emacs makes almost as much
> sense as giving Screen Emacs-like scriptability
Come to think of it, that functionality more-or-less already exists;
"M-x term" within Emacs pretty much fits
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Scogland wrote:
>> While I'm relatively new here I thought I'd throw in my 2 cents on the
>> matter. Having everything doable via scripting sounds good, but it
>> should be a situation where something is only done in scripting if you
>> want to rep
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > The trend I would like to see is not just extending screen with a
> > powerful language but reducing the C code where possible by this
> > langua
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Johannes Weiner wrote:
> The trend I would like to see is not just extending screen with a
> powerful language but reducing the C code where possible by this
> language. Sort of like it's done with emacs (only that emacs was
> probably written to t
16 matches
Mail list logo
