ink that's been in development recently.
-- Thomas Adam
___
screen-users mailing list
screen-users@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-users
s a
> bash-command (?))
> screen -X at 24389.ca-mb% stats (does nothing at all)
> ...
>
> Any ideas?
Look at what the "stuff" command does in screen.
-- Thomas Adam
___
screen-users mailing list
screen-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-users
On 15 October 2010 22:15, Bruce Edge wrote:
> Is there a .screenrc option that generates cleaner log files?
>
> IOW, without the LF characters and other non-printable characters?
col -bx < ./some_screen_logfile > ./tmp_file && mv ./tmp_file
./some_screen_
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 03:44:33PM -0800, Aaron Davies wrote:
> On Jan 29, 2010, at 1:46 PM, Thomas Adam wrote:
> >On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 03:30:38PM -0600,
> >bradley.sch...@usbank.com wrote:
> >
> >>I'm calling screen from a script and want to set the ses
d to still export VARNAME?
-- Thomas Adam
--
"It was the cruelest game I've ever played and it's played inside my head."
-- "Hush The Warmth", Gorky's Zygotic Mynci.
___
screen-users mailing list
screen-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-users
tely, the version of screen that I have doesn't offer a
> "provide options on the command line" switch, and screen doesn't
> work with bash process substitution:
> $ screen <( echo "hardstatus on" )
> Unable to open "/dev/fd/63".
Go read up
2009/6/10 Solaris :
> Thanks for the info, but I would like to know if there is a tip to
> reinitialize all screen numbers automatically, or by script.
http://www.quesera.com/reynhout/misc/screen+bumpandcollapse/
-- Thomas Adam
___
screen
not set when the backtick command is
> executed.
>
> How could I get the session name otherwise?
Using the Git sources: "%S" will display the session name.
-- Thomas Adam
___
screen-users mailing list
screen-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-users
2009/1/10 moueza :
>
> hi,
> Doing Ctl-a S splits horizontally, but what fot vertically?
^A |
-- Thomas Adam
___
screen-users mailing list
screen-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-users
n I say "slow", I mean that when I say "less
> file", it takes ~20 seconds for it to put the first screenful of
> data up.
>
> Any idea what's up?
It's a known caveat of vertical splits in screen. Screen has to
2008/10/4 Chris Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Has anyone here taken a peek at David Douthitt's
>
>"GNU Screen A Comprehensive Introduction"
Yes -- it's not that comprehensive, and reads like an annotated
version of the sc
i already links to some dotfiles which could be used for
> starters.)
It's a nice idea. See:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?24387
-- Thomas Adam
___
screen-users mailing list
screen-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-users
Hello --
2008/9/18 Jaap Taal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Is the backtick command executed with the original enviroment instead of the
> environment a shell inside screen would have?
Yes. And note that in the GIT version of screen, there's now a "%S"
identifier to do wha
ile should do what you ask of it. I am working on documentation for
this.
-- Thomas Adam
___
screen-users mailing list
screen-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-users
- renumbering those
such that it doesn't conflict with another window number in a layout
is going to be an issue.
-- Thomas Adam
___
screen-users mailing list
screen-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-users
ideas about how I might
> do this, or when a feature like this might be available?
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?23597
-- Thomas Adam
___
screen-users mailing list
screen-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-users
ew yodl maintainers
Well, I already have a few candidates in mind as potential
single-source markup; yodl was never one of them, and certainly won't
be now.
-- Thomas Adam
___
screen-users mailing list
screen-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-users
2008/8/13 Juergen Weigert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So your plan looks like this:
> - compare man and texinfo,
> - bring them back in sync
> - (later) find a tool to generate both from one source
>
> right?
Yep. Spot on. :)
-- Thomas Adam
__
x27;ll use to identify yourself for pushes, and request membership to
> the Screen group.
Okey dokey. Will do so shortly after dinner. Thanks very much!
-- Thomas Adam
___
screen-users mailing list
screen-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-users
then. ;)
> On Aug 12, 08 17:45:08 +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
>> Or use asciidoc or txt2tags, etc.
>
> I like that plan!
Which? ;) I'm going to sit tight on this thread for a few days, so I
know the best direction to take.
-- Thomas Adam
_
tails... of course, doing such a thing
> would also mean that it would be a lot more challenging to generate from
> the Texinfo documentation, so would really require a separate maintainer
> (or more heavy modifications to texi2pod, or something).
I disagree. Having one manpage for screen, and anoth
$ export COLUMNS LINES
Rather unportably between Unixes:
eval $(resize)
-- Thomas Adam
___
screen-users mailing list
screen-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-users
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:43:24 -0700
Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been successfully using both Emacs and Vim under screen with
> mouse support. Both required configuration adjustments to make it
> happen.
Can you share this information, please? Sounds interesting.
If so, how can i unlock it?
I don't suppose you've got some backtick commands in your hardstatus, have you?
-- Thomas Adam
___
screen-users mailing list
screen-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-users
will happen I'm afraid.
-- Thomas Adam
--
"It was the cruelest game I've ever played and it's played inside my
head." -- "Hush The Warmth", Gorky's Zygotic Mynci.
___
screen-users mailing list
screen-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-users
anges the default runlevel from 5 to 3.
>
> The sys-v init package on RedHat (and I'd guess Ubuntu/Debian),
> define runlevels as:
No. This is unnecessary. X11 is started in all runlevels 2->5 on a
Debian (and derived) system. To disable X running in any one of those,
simply (as ro
set the
> title in the hardstatus line.
>
> Thank you anyway...
http://gentoo-wiki.com/Talk:TIP_Using_screen
-- Thomas Adam
___
screen-users mailing list
screen-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-users
Hi --
On 11/11/2007, Hermann Gausterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if i use only the old (horizontal) split mode, everything
> is fast as expected; is this a known problem?
Yes -- vertical splits have to redraw themselves which makes things
like scrolling slow.
--
On 28/09/2007, Andy Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> On 9/28/07, Thomas Adam wrote:
> > What I would like (assuming I was in window 0) is, when I went to
> > window 1 none of the split screens were pr
ssible currently, what sort of changes would be involved
in making it happen? I don't mind attempting a patch, I've not looked
at any of screen's internals yet.
-- Thomas Adam
___
screen-users mailing list
screen-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-users
30 matches
Mail list logo
