by me).
HTH,
--
Jonathan Daugherty
http://www.b-tree.org
___
screen-users mailing list
screen-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-users
# Yes, currently a vertical split is expensive. As screen doesn't use
# any special "region-scrolling" functions of the terminals it has to
# do lots of refreshes. I hope to fix that soon (at least for xterm).
Great; I'm glad I noticed it, then. Thanks!
--
Jonathan Daug
# On 2/20/07, Jonathan Daugherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# >
# >instantaneous. If I then run ^a| and run the same command in a
# >
#
# To what have you bound the ^a| key sequence?
The new vertical split feature (as described in the original post).
--
Jonathan Daugherty
quot;ps aux" in a
plain screen window (not split) or a plain xterm of comparable width
results in the faster behavior, so I'm lead to think that screen is
involved.
--
Jonathan Daugherty
http://www.b-tree.org
___
screen-user
I really like using the split function to create vertically-split
regions. Is there a way to split screen horizontally, too?
--
Jonathan Daugherty
http://www.parsed.org
___
screen-users mailing list
screen-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org
Is there a way to bind a key to scrolling the scrollback buffer such
that I don't need to enter copy/scrollback mode each time I want to
scroll?
--
Jonathan Daugherty
http://www.parsed.org
___
screen-users mailing list
screen-users@gnu.org
