Re: "exec .!" filters seeing responses to "query" escape sequences

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Juergen Weigert wrote: > On Aug 08, 08 18:52:53 -0700, Micah Cowan wrote: >> For consistency, one could also consider having screen swallow up >> mouse-tracking responses, and reissue them down only the ttys on which >> requests had been seen. >> >> Bu

Re: "exec .!" filters seeing responses to "query" escape sequences

On Aug 08, 08 18:52:53 -0700, Micah Cowan wrote: > > For consistency, one could also consider having screen swallow up > mouse-tracking responses, and reissue them down only the ttys on which > requests had been seen. > > But that wouldn't be a general solution, since other term-specific > query/

Re: Getting screen size into the env?

On Aug 07, 08 12:18:53 -0400, Mark Eichin wrote: > "Thomas Adam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > 2008/8/7 Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> However, if you use bash, it will set _shell_ variables, COLUMNS and > >> LINES, automatically. This isn't something that screen does, but bash. > >> Ba

Re: Screen, xterm, initialization strings.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stephane Chazelas wrote: > On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 07:42:22PM -0700, Micah Cowan wrote: > [...] >> I propose that screen not send the initialization string. Probably with >> a command-line option that specifies it should be sent (though, IMO it >> shou

Re: 2 problems using screen with sshfs and symlinks

On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 07:44:32AM -0700, Ken Steen wrote: > I have a small file manager that uses screen to open programs in new > screen windows. It works correctly except when using screen on a > directory mounted with sshfs or when using screen on a directory that is > a symbolic link. If the

Re: Screen, xterm, initialization strings.

On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 07:42:22PM -0700, Micah Cowan wrote: [...] > I propose that screen not send the initialization string. Probably with > a command-line option that specifies it should be sent (though, IMO it > should be sent before smkx, and not after). Any thoughts on this? [...] On the oth

Re: Mouse-support with "exec" filters

On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 02:18:02PM -0700, Micah Cowan wrote: [...] > I think the discussion I wished to have, was whether there was agreement > that in all cases we would wish the mouse sequences to go to the filter, > rather than the application. I would think that in many cases, one would > wish