Re: Tab bar

2006-08-23 Thread cga2000
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:17:39PM EDT, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On 8/23/06, Toby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Hello > > > >I, like many others, find the "tabbed" metaphor of recent browsers and > >other programs very intuitive and practical. > > > >As such, I'd love to see a similar device implemen

Re: vim syntax highlighting does not work in screen

2006-08-23 Thread aladdin
aladdin wrote: Hi, all. My vim syntax highlighting does not work in SCREEN. The problem occurs under RedHat9, vim 6.1.320, SCREEN 4.00.02, remote login with putty. I have another Debian Sarge Linux under which vim and SCREEN work well together. I checked the screenrc file but cannot find an

Re: Tab bar

2006-08-23 Thread Aaron Griffin
On 8/23/06, Toby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello I, like many others, find the "tabbed" metaphor of recent browsers and other programs very intuitive and practical. As such, I'd love to see a similar device implemented in screen, or to do it myself. But first I'd like to hear what you think a

Tab bar

2006-08-23 Thread Toby
Hello I, like many others, find the "tabbed" metaphor of recent browsers and other programs very intuitive and practical. As such, I'd love to see a similar device implemented in screen, or to do it myself. But first I'd like to hear what you think about it. My idea is to 'waste' one terminal l

Re: Always give bell msg

2006-08-23 Thread Michael Schroeder
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 04:12:09PM +0200, Maurice van der Pot wrote: > Last year I sent this message to the list, but to date I have not had > any replies. Should I conclude that this patch does not have a chance of > making it into screen or did it just slip through the cracks? Well, it's just no

Re: Always give bell msg

2006-08-23 Thread Maurice van der Pot
Hi, Last year I sent this message to the list, but to date I have not had any replies. Should I conclude that this patch does not have a chance of making it into screen or did it just slip through the cracks? Regards, Maurice. On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 05:44:33PM +0200, Maurice van der Pot wrote: